TWA Flight 800   

Was TWA 800 Shot Down By a Military Missile?
Today is the tenth anniversary of the shoot-down. - M. R.
TWA Flight 800: THE MAGIC WING BOX
WHY THE OFFICIAL STORY CONTRADICTS ITSELF.
TWA Flight 800: STATEMENTS BY EYEWITNESSES STATEMENTS BY EYEWITNESSES
TWA Flight 800: Charles Basset and the Red Residue
During the trial of James Sanders, the NTSB was caught red-handed rigging the lab tests on the red residue found on the wreckage, then lying about the results in their final report. - M. R.
> Halliburton's Fleecing Ends -- Or Does It?
I wonder how many customers McDonald's Corp. would keep if instead of including a Coke with a Happy Meal, as the menu promised, the company charged for it twice.

That's what Halliburton Co. did to Uncle Sam, billing $45 for soda by the case and billing for it again when served by the glass at meals.

July 15, 2006

TWA Flight 800 Federal Law Suit for ‘missing evidence’ Filed Today
One wreckage item in particular was described as possibly being the “smoking gun” by FIRO Chairman Dr. Tom Stalcup. The wreckage exited Flight 800’s airframe at apparent supersonic speeds and landed about a half mile closer to JFK airport than any other piece of wreckage. The Navy recovered it, but it never made it to the reconstruction hangar.
When TWA 800 exploded, radar tracked an object departing the scene of the disaster at supersonic speeds, traveling at right angles to the path of the 747. The US Navy recovered the object, yet that object was never turned over to the NTSB reconstruction hanger. Why? - M. R.
TWA 800: Missing Evidence and CIA Propaganda
 
The mainstream media is cranking up a huge propaganda campaign to sell the official version of history to you.

Please keep in mind that these are the same people who told you Iraq had 'nookular' bombs. - M. R.

TWA Flight 800: THE MAGIC WING BOX
WHY THE OFFICIAL STORY CONTRADICTS ITSELF.
 
FLASHBACK: TWA800: THE CASE AGAINST A TERRORIST MISSILE
 
As we near the anniversary of the shoot-down of TWA 800, look for the "Phlogs" to pretend to expose the truth, but to point the finger of blame for the missile at "terrorists".

But close examination shows why nobody at the scene reacted as if the missile that shot down TWA 800 had come from an unknown source. - M. R.

July 08, 2006

10 years after TWA 800 tragedy, doubts abound
 
MOre about TWA 800 and the evidence for a missile strike and government cover-up are HERE - M. R.

June 04, 2006

TWA 800: 10 years later, feds' story still suspect
Graeme Sephton, an engineer and citizen investigator, submitted a Freedom of Information Act request for the FBI lab reports. Mr. Sephton was denied. He initiated a lawsuit. Surprisingly, he won and the court ordered the FBI to produce the reports. Subsequently, the FBI came back and said it had searched for the reports and couldn't find them. The court then ruled that the FBI had made a good faith effort, and Mr. Sephton was denied. The most widely publicized and most expensive accident investigation in the history of aviation, and the FBI loses its own lab reports? That is highly unlikely. Presumably, the objects still exist. Obviously, the FBI does not want the public to know what it found.
More about TWA 800 is HERE - M. R.

August 09, 2004

Missiles on terrorists' shoulders
 
Jack Cashill tries to sell the lemon that Iranian terrorists shot down TWA 800. And the reason that his story is just more war propaganda is simple.

Witnesses who saw a missile hit TWA 800 saw it rise up from an area where the US Navy was conducting tests of Aegis-CEC, a co-operative multi-platform system designed to detect and defend against missiles. The Navy tests included live-fire tests of missiles to simulate the incoming threat. It should be noted that the system had alreedy proven it worked in earlier tests near Hawaii.

As TWA 800 fell out of the sky, some US Navy ships headed into the crash scene, while other US Navy ships sailed back to port.

So, for Jack Cashill's "let's blame the Arabs for this too" theory to work, the mythical terrorists had to sail int the middle of an ongoing USA Navy test of an anti-missile system, flip off the very sort of missile the system was designed to detect, kill a 747, then sail right back out WITHOUT A SINGLE US NAVY WARSHIP OR PLANE GIVING CHASE.

You believe that? Cashill apparently does.

And here is another fact that Cashill seems to want to ignore. In the court trial of James Sanders, the NTSB was caught rigging lab tests on the red residue found inside the TWA 800 cabin, and lying about the test results when the rigging did not produce the desired results. Why would the NTSB be covering up for Iranians?

Or is Jack Cashill's real purpose to protect the Navy by framing the enemy de jour for the shoot-down of TWA 800? - M. R.

July 11, 2006

Shrapnel evidence from victims holds key

July 12, 2006

How the FBI misled the public