Where Did the Towers Go?
9-11 -
World Trade Towers

by Judy Wood, B.S., M.S., PhD., Clemson Univ.  

www.DrJudyWood.com 
WTC Evidence that Must be Explained 4

Overview    www.abodia.com/911

We stand at the dawn of an entirely new age. By all the evidence, man has in his hands a method of disrupting the molecular basis for matter and the ability, very possibly, to split the earth in half on a moment's notice. The technology demonstrated on 9/11 can, indeed, split the earth in half,' or it can be used to allow all people to live fruitful, constructive, and non-polluting lives through their use of free energy.

He who controls energy, controls people.

Energy can be use to destroy or sustain the planet.

We have a choice. And the choice is real. We can live happily and fruitfully and productively, or we can destroy the planet and die, every last one of us, along with every living being on this planet.

These are reasons Judy Wood spent so much time studying the evidence of what happened on 9/11. 9/11 was a demonstration to the world of a new technology known as free energy. This is a force that can be used for demonic, ruinous, Earth ­destructive purposes. Or it can be used for the good of us, of the Earth, and of our civilizations. We have a choice. And that choice is ours.

Explain why ejecta wass being propelled upward in what is officials said to be a downward "collapse,"  

 

Here are Facts of the destruction of WTC

1. Hurricane Erin was located just off Long Island throughout day of 9/11/01, Why did pilot not see the Hurricane ? Why wasn’t it reported in news ?

2. about 1,400 motor vehicles were toasted in strange ways during the destruction of the Twin Towers. Metals damage, vinyl not disturbed. Cars were ½ mile away from the WTC ? Damage by electro- magnetic not by heat of fire

4. large enough volumes of dust made of nano-sized particles went up, enough to block out 100% of sunlight in some areas.

5. There was absence of high heat. Witnesses reported dust cloud felt cooler

6. WTC dust continued to break down, become finer & finer long after 9/11

7. 1st responders on 9/11 testified as to toasted cars, spontaneous "fires" (including the flaming heavy coat of a running medic, who survived), the instant disappearance of people, a plane turning into a fireball in mid-air, electrical power cut off moments before WTC 2 destruction, and the sound of explosions.

8. For more than 7 years, regions in the ground under where the main body of WTC 4 stood have continued to fume. WHY?

10. Magnetometer readings from six stations in Alaska recorded abrupt shifts in the Earth's magnetic field as each of the major destructive events unfolded at the WTC on 9/11. WHY? (HAARP ?)

11. Many cars in the neighborhood of the WTC complex were flipped upside down. They…  stood adjacent to trees with full foliage, not stripped by high wind.

12. More damage was done to the bathtub by earth-moving equipment during the clean-up process than from the destruction of more then a million tons of buildings above it.

13. Most of the destroyed towers underwent mid-air pulverization and were turned to dust before they hit the ground.

14. Near-instant rusting of affected steel provided evidence of molecular dissociation and transmutation. WHY?

15. Of about 3,000 toilets in WTC 1 and WTC 2, not one survived, nor was any recognizable portion of one found. WHY?

16. Only one piece of office equipment in the entire WTC complex, a filing cabinet with folder dividers, survived. WHY?

17. Only the north wing of WTC 4 was left standing, neatly sliced from the main body, which virtually disappeared. FACT

18. Rail lines, tunnels and most of the rail cars at levels under the WTC complex had only light damage, if any. WHY?

20. Scott-Paks-portable air-tanks for firemen frequently exploded for no visible reason. Entire fire trucks themselves that were parked near WTC exploded. WHY? HOW?

21. Sheets of plain office paper were omnipresent throughout lower Manhattan after each tower's destruction. This paper, however, remained unburned, even though it was often immediately adjacent to flaming cars or steel beams glowing red, yellow, even white. WHY?

23. Steel columns in WTC were curled around vertical axes like rolled­ up carpets. Columns, when they buckle from overloaded, would be bent around horizontal, not the vertical, axis.

24. "collapse" of WTC [did]  little damage to neighboring buildings.

25. WTC Bldg 7 collapsed at 5:30 pm, quietly. No seismic signal. No plane hit it nor were there big fires. 47 story bldg was $ ¾ billion

28. The majority of the towers (WTC 1, WTC 2, WTC 3, WTC 7) did not remain as rigid bodies as they "fell." WHY NOT?

29. The method of destruction in the case of each tower did minimum damage to the bathtub and adjacent buildings,

31. The seismic impact was minimal during destructions of WTC 1, WTC 2 & WTC 7 & far too small to correspond with a conventional "collapse" as based on a comparison with Kingdome controlled demolition.

32. Twin Towers were destroyed from the top down, not from bottom up.

33. The WTC were destroyed in a shorter time than can be explained by physics as a "collapse" even at free-fall speed.

34. The upper 80 %, approximately; of each tower was turned into fine dust and did not crash to the earth.

35. The upper 90 %, approximately; of the inside of WTC 7 was turned into fine dust and did not crash to the earth.

36. The WTC underground mall survived well, witnessed by Warner Brothers' Road Runner and friends.

37. The WTC 1 and WTC 2 rubble pile was far too small to account for the total mass of the buildings.

38. The WTC 7 rubble pile was too small to account for the total mass of the building, and much of it consisted of mud.

39. Truckloads of dirt were hauled both into and out of the WTC site, a pattern that continues to this day.

40. What this book calls lather, thick clouds of dust and fumes, emanated from some faces of buildings before destruction, as if large volumes of the buildings' mass was dissolving into the air.

41. What this book calls weird fire appeared frequently on 9/11. This "fire" flamed but gave no evidence of providing heat, not even enough to burn nearby sheets of paper. WHY?

43. Changes and alterations in materials on 9/11 were similar or even identical in a great many ways to the changes and alterations in materials caused by The Hutchison Effect. The Hutchison Effect is known to result in material-altering phenomena of the kinds we have listed here.

C. Summary

To determine what happened on 9/11,
not just some,

but all available evidence must be considered.

Before sundown on 9/11/01, 7 buildings lay in ruins, some of which quite simply looked bombed, and one of those buildings in ruins, a 47-story tower, had not even, in its disappearance, produced a seismic impact that was significantly identifiable beyond normal background

Impossible as it may seem, most of the steel from those towers also vanished, literally turned into dust. From Day One of clearing ground zero, around-the-clock photos of the demolition were taken. Did you see any photos of the 3000 truckloads of steel being driven away? Neither did I.

A few surviving massive steel members were completely convoluted. … these incredible, impossibly-contorted shapes were NOT the result of a jet-fueled, relatively low-temperature, fire

One exceptionally astute scientist/ experimentalist, John Hutchison, produces field effects that contort metal in manners comparable to what we see in official photos of those grossly-twisted structural members of heavy steel.

None of the facts, events, anomalies, or phenomena we listed, discussed, & analyzed in book can be explained by airliner crashes, jet fuel fires, or any scheme of controlled demolition.

This book is not about naming a known technology, It’s about observing evidence of what happened and understanding what happened. As explained at the end of Chapter 20 (pages 451 to 432), there will likely be those who will not be able to resist the impulse to put a name of a known technology on what produced this evidence. To do so blindly assumes such technology is in the public domain. This naming introduces assumptions that distract from understanding the actual evidence and will only serve to pull a veil of mystery over it.

 

notes by Ted Elden, retired architect,

c/o 1331 MacCorkle Ave. SE, Charleston, W. Va.

304 344 2335  a @ abodia.com  www.abodia.com/911   …/t   …/5   /law

Truth Seeker meet bi-weekly @ Library

Schedules at www.abodia.com/t

1,000s of DVD documentaries, books,
and more. Visit us. Fun !