Flight 93
Flight
93 'was shot down' claims book
However, the absence of any
significant debris — including tailplane and wings —
bewildered witnesses, relatives and, more importantly, some crash experts.
They found it hard to believe that an
airliner up to 155ft long, with two engines each
weighing more than six tons, could have penetrated the ground so completely as
to utterly disappear. Had it, in reality, been blown to pieces in mid-air?
Certainly it is unclear how a single piece of fuselage the size of a dining room table could have been recovered from a marina in Indian Lake, a couple of miles away from the crash site — unless it fell from the sky during an aerial break-up.
'The Social Security Death
Index (SSDI) is a privately owned website that is not affiliated with Social
Security.' In fact, it is a database and query for obtaining information on the
names of deceased Americans. He continues, 'It boasts an accuracy rate of about
83%...To check its reliability, I input the names of people I knew that had
died in my family along with friends and neighbors... and with the exception of
a cousin, I found everyone I was looking for.' Searching for the 9-11 victims
names in the registry, Sammartino writes that on Mr.
Todd Beamer's Flight 93, 'of the 45 people who are listed as dying in this
flight, only six are listed in the Social Security Death Index (13%).'
Rumsfeld says 9-11 plane 'shot down' in Pennsylvania
DONALD RUMSFELD, SECRETARY
OF DEFENSE: And I think all of us have a sense if we imagine the kind of world
we would face if the people who bombed the mess hall in Mosul,
or the people who did the bombing in Spain, or the people who attacked the
United States in New York, shot down the plane over Pennsylvania and
attacked the Pentagon, the people who cut off peoples' heads on television to
intimidate, to frighten -- indeed the word "terrorized" is just that.
Its purpose is to terrorize, to alter behavior, to make people be something
other than that which they want to be."
NOTE THE FOLLOWING QUOTE
(Before they remove it) : DONALD RUMSFELD, SECRETARY
OF DEFENSE: And to change that way of living, would strike at the very essence
of our country. And I think all of us have a sense if we imagine the kind of
world we would face if the people who bombed the mess hall in Mosul, or the people who did the bombing in Spain, or the
people who attacked the United States in New York, shot down the plane over
Pennsylvania and attacked the Pentagon, the people who cut off peoples'
heads on television to intimidate, to frighten -- indeed the word
"terrorized" is just that. Its purpose is to terrorize, to alter
behavior, to make people be something other than that which they want to be. -
M. R
"I mean, who are you
going to trust, the Secretary of Defense, or the internet? Ummm, let me rephrase that..."
- M. R.
Has Devvy
really cleared anything up? Yes, the
coroner's lack of report is in question, but now the crash is verified? Hardly!
Where is the physical and photographic evidence?
After reading Devvy
Kid's account of her PA investigation
https://www.devvy.com/flight_93_part_3.html,
the following craves an answer, based upon the laws of evidence and
probability:
1.
What is the mathematical probability that a 9/11 aircraft would just so
happen to crash PRECISELY on an "abandoned strip mine" (how
perfect)--WHICH CONVENIENTLY BURIES THE EVIDENCE ENITRELY--which Devvy uses to explain away the missing debris? There appears to be NO identifiable parts,
and only 8% of human remains. (This
ASSUMES the number of bodies should match that of flight 93, or a flight 93
that did not land at
2. What identifiable evidence is there that this
was indeed flight 93, rather than some other aircraft?
WHAT ARE THE MATHEMATICAL ODDS OF HAVING A CRASH THAT LEAVES NO
IDENTIFIABLE PARTS (except that we are TOLD than an "engine" flew
into the lake nearby...which evidence has never been
presented?)
I would like to see the report of how that ONE piece of evidence, the
engine, happened to be found.....one report says woods,
this report claims body of water.
3.
Interview with farmer
https://www.devvy.com/pdf/Flight93/lambert_interview_080205.pdf
is very poor in the transcript, and he even says, "...I thought, what the
heck is that?
Maybe its an airplane...". "MAYBE ITS AN AIRPLANE?"
THAT IS HARDLY CONVINCING PROOF OR
POSITIVE IDENTIFICATION OF FLIGHT 93! He
appears to admit he has never seen an airliner?
If our witness is reliable, then what did he really see? He talks about what he has been TOLD, more
than what he actually saw.
4.
Maybe Devvy should post on the web the pieces
of wreckage debris that they picked up!
(Is it standard procedure to leave any debris behind....oh, and the
earth, from the mine, just keeps "belching" out evidence from its
bowels? SOUNDS LIKE PLANTED EVIDENCE TO
ME! What parts of the aircraft is this
"debris" from? What kind did
they find? No description is given.
5.
The farmer in the transcript gives NO IDENTIFICATION of the plane
(admitting he did not recognize what it was), yet gives as vague account of how
it went (D.C. Dane seems to lead him well), but KNOWS that it crashed at
"585
mph". Talk about an indoctrinated witness!
6.
The "interview" continues to lead the witness (he is not asked
to trace the events by "tell us what you saw, in detail,
please")......see the way Dane in particular leads him from point to
point....."did you see any smoke?.....yes black
smoke within a second (this is necessary to prove kerosene fuel was burning,
yet it does not explain the "huge fireball").
This is the worst interview or
objective investigative questioning I have ever read. IT IS ADMITTED AT THE END THAT HIS WIFE COULD
NOT BE REACHED.
"Let every testimony be confirmed
by 2 or 3 witnesses". HE ALONE, not
his wife, is the sole interview near the site, and he volunteers his time there
(no doubt, then, telling the official story).
7.
"trees caught on fire". Does not show that in any
of the aerial photos.
I have talked to Pentagon families
at gun shows and they "resent" when Flight 77 is questioned about
Pentagon crash.....but none of their family in the Pentagon saw or found any
commercial jet or debris, or evidence.
THE 9/11 COVERUP IS BASED ENTIRELY
ON MISSING CONCLUSIVE MATERIAL OR PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE FROM ALLEGED HIJAKCED
COMMERCIAL AIRLINERS. Yet Devvy justifies the lack of evidence in this
"investigative" report, and also "debunks" the German film
company's photos and quotes of the mayor!
8.
The mayor says the German film company took his words "out of
context", but does not correct, or amend his words reported. MOST MAYOR'S KNOW HOW TO DEAL WITH THE
PRESS, AND DEMAND CORRECTIONS. This
mayor did not get it right in his own local papers.
[Apparently WCPO
Is Devvy a
patriot infiltrator, with a Pentagon husband?
How about D.C.
Dane?
Did Dane pull the wool over her eyes, and pre-call and setup the
situation?
911 Nutshell:
9/11 Flight 93 Passengers 'Lost'
https://www.rense.com/general67/911pass.htm
>