13th-attention    2021-11-23    Home of Missing 13th Amendment: abodia.com/t/law/13

            see also 14th amendment flaw        US Treasury given to Fed. Reserve 1920.

History is taught in the schools and universities for the past century to support a lawful appearance for what is really unlawful.

Here's a QUESTION due to fake history I doubt you or your Professor/teacher or Attorney can answer, but I can. To create a different Government in 1867 they had to replace the Government our Founders Created in 1788. They did and called it Reconstruction. https://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llsl&fileName=014/llsl014.db&recNum=459
The Reconstruction Acts of the 39th Congress created a temporary Government only for the named 11 Rebel States. There were 11 Rebel States. The Reconstruction Acts only name 10 of the 11 Southern States in the first paragraph this temporary Government was being created for. . Tennessee was not named because that State agreed to go along with Reconstruction voluntarily. The last sentence of the first paragraph of The Reconstruction Acts even states its temporary Quote" until the loyal Republic State Governments can be legally established ". You can't show me where the "temporary" Reconstruction Government has ever stepped down, nor can you show me where the Reconstruction Acts have ever been repealed.

SO THE QUESTION IS. WHY DON'T WE HAVE TWO GOVERNMENTS FOR THE 50 STATES??? How did the other now 39 States get the same temporary Government made only for the 11 Rebel States in 1867??

ANSWER: The Original/Organic Constitutional Republic the other 39 States should have is still in military suspension per marshal law President Lincoln enacted in the middle of the Civil War known as General Orders 100 April,23,1863. https://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/lieber.asp
The required Treaty of Peace was never signed per Article 32
in order to settle the permanency of that change martial law). Read section 32. https://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/lieber.asp#sec2
National Park Services is where the Presidential Speeches and debates are stored from the Library of Congress SEE NPS.gov? https://www.nps.gov/apco/faqs.htm
The second paragraph's first sentence says "no Treaty of Peace was ever signed to end the Civil War. Also, SEE U.S. Supreme Court Texas v. White 74 US 700, 1868 https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/74/700
The Supreme Court even said no Treaty of Peace was ever signed to end the Civil War. The Supreme Court went on to say the Southern States never had real or Lawful Government they were untreatable and NOTHING they did had any lawful effect whatsoever including the Ordinance of Subsection. It was a complete Null and void.

SECOND ATTENTION GETTER How did the 13th Amendment get lawfully passed when had it not been for 8 of the 11 Southern States voting to Abolish Slavery and passing the 13th Amendment ratification would have failed. https://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llsl&fileName=013/llsl013.db&recNum=804
It passed by one vote GEORGIA was the deciding State.
If the Southern States didn't have real or lawful governments pursuant to Texas v. White, then how did the 13th Amendment get lawfully passed? This means the landmark decision from the US Supreme Court Texas v. White was WRONG and the Southern States did have real and lawful Governments OR the 13th Amendment did NOT lawfully get adopted.
SO THIS QUESTION IS; How can the 13th Amendment and Texas v. White both be lawful and correct??

THIRD ATTENTION-GETTER I highly doubt you, your Attorney, teacher/professor can answer.
If the Southern States did have lawful Governments, then the 13th Amendment was lawfully passed, then the 14th Amendment was an unlawful treasonous usurp that did NOT lawfully get passed. The US Supreme Court made clear in Colman v. Miller 307 U.S. 433 (1939) https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/307/433/
The Southern States declined to adopt the 14th Amendment (as UnConstitutional) so through a military act of Congress known as Reconstruction. NEW Governments were formed and NEW States was erected in the former Southern States in VIOLATION of Article 4 section 3 US Constitution which provides "no State shall be formed within the borders of an existing state without the consent of that State and Congress. And the NEW Southern States adopted the 14th Amendment. The 39th Congress claimed the Southern States did not have real or lawful Government as the reason for Reconstruction.

SO THE QUESTION IS:

How can both the 13th Amendment and the 14th Amendment both be lawful??
Not only is the 14th Amendment the jurisdiction that allows for felons to be disenfranchised it's the jurisdiction for the courts, and laws, taxes, gun control, national debt, Exc. in America since July 28, 1868.

FOURTH ATTENTION GETTER All 11 Southern States said to repeal their State Constitutions with the Ordnance of Succession between the years 1860-1861. All 11 Southern States were several State Constitutions into the future when the US Supreme Court decision came out in 1869 Texas v. White which said in part "the ordinance of Cession was null and void and had no lawful effect whatsoever". Which is how all 11 southern States said to have repealed their lawful Constitutions to join the said Confederate States of America. None of the 11 Southern States has ever gone back and repealed their State Constitutions never correctly repealed due to the Ordinance of Succession later becoming null and void. These states Constitutions that were never correctly repealed were adopted pursuant to the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution which holds all laws and treaties ratified pursuant to the US Constitution "Supreme Law of the land".

FIFTH ATTENTION GETTER Ten of the 11 Southern States were reduced to Conquered Territories. The former States Conquered by the United States in order to form New State Governments. https://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llhb&fileName=040%2Fllhb040.db&recNum=543&fbclid=IwAR2LBw7uOOFbre6CLijMm8aM_xfXh7xVLoiJMYOPWmOi3RFuvL8gIpHgoj0
The Southern States was NEVER made a lawful States again. ONLY GIVEN "representation in Congress as a STATE" https://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llsl&fileName=015/llsl015.db&recNum=741 which is not our Constitutional process of converting a territory to a state.
- - -