Right to Travel

Charles Sprinkles has been driving, actually traveling in California for 37 years without a driver's license, since 1985 ? at age 35, when he sued Governor Ronald Regan for his not protecting his constitutionally right to travel.

 This is the link for his court document

https://charliesprinkle.info/charlie-sprinkle.php

This is the link for his story on Video

https://www.begnopardon.com/videos.html

or here on You tube:

I don't drive, I travel.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fS43EIQQ7ak

If you are not being paid to carry passengers nor carrying packages, then you don't need a driver's license.

If you don't need the driver's license, then you also don't need to register your car, have license plate, insurance, can't lawfully get a ticket for any non crime, wherein there is no injured party.

Therefore these things are not a crime:

- no seat belt, - running a stop sign or red light, speeding, etc.

Learn of your rights.

Charles Sprinkles wrote to Governor Regan to protect Charlie's right to travel, thereby breaching Regan's oath of office to protect the people from infringement of constitutional rights.

Here is a great web site:

https://www.begnopardon.com/

Driving vs Traveling:

https://www.begnopardon.com/driving-vs-traveling.html

Carl Miller, a Viet Nam vet, has great Constitutional defenses.  Here's his you tube.  If links don't work, search Carl Miller on You tube.

Carl Miller - Right to travel without a license pl ates    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cV8gRA-JYeg

Here is transcript of Miller on You & the Constitution.  Know this and restore your rights.

Know Your Constitution - Carl Miller Part 1 of 3 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1s-zHrNPfkQ

- - - -

Carl Miller - Right to Travel without a license pl on You Tube

This is what he says in court & wins !!

Whoa your honor, are you the judge, a disinterested 3rd party to try this case.  Trier of facts.

Is the prosecutor there ?

 Judge why are you asking discovery questions, that is his job.

Judge is the tryer of fact

the prosecutor is the tryer of the case.

If you judge, operate as both the judge and the prosecutor, I object on the record, as an appealable issue.

Did you have any plates on your car ?

No & I don't intend to get any.

I assume you have a reason.

Can I hear it ?

I am unenfranchised common law freeman, not a participant in any tontine schemes of limited liability or joint venture with a private insurance company requiring me to participate in these corporate ponzi schemes.

(tontine - an annuity scheme in which subscribers share a common fund with the benefit of survivorship, the survivors' shares being increased as the subscribers die, until the whole goes to the last survivor. )

I am a Little Joe from Kokomo. I live on the block.

I travel at the common law.

I have a right to free travel free and unencumbered pursuant to  Shapario vs Thompson.  That right is so basic it does not need to be mentioned.

The state of Michigan/ WV arbitrarily & ironically converted my right into  a privilege and issued a license plate and a fee for it.

Murdock vs Pennsylvania says that no state may convert a secured liberty into a privilege and issue a license and a fee for it.

If they do Shuttle vs Birmingham AL say that I can ignore the license and engage in the right with impunity. That means that you can't punish me.

Since I rely on previous decisions of the Supreme Court and Constitutional defenses, I have a perfect defense for willfulness.  I am immune to the prosecution.

Therefore the prosecution counsel does not have a cause of action for which relief can be granted.

I motion the court to dismiss with prejudice for failure to state a cause of action for which relief can be granted.

I'd like to collect my costs and fee for having to prepare to defend this frivolous case.

- - - -

We are defenseless unless we have knowledge.

 Start with Carl on the driving without license tags as I did.

 He makes it very simple and very clear.

 Go on to You tube and watch him, or read the transcript.

 We all pray we have no involvement with government or police, but when we have the slightest bump with them - bang !

 We are defenseless because we don't know our constitution and our rights.

 Carl makes this much more simple then any I have studied.

 Know Your Constitution - Carl Miller Part 1 of 3

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1s-zHrNPfkQ

 You can find Call Miller on You tube explaining the constitution, the most fundamental protection that we all have.

 I like this because it is simple and comprehensive.

I learn best in reading.

 Here is a transcript of Miller on the constitution.

Carl Miller on

The United States Constitution

https://www.myprivateaudio.com/carltext.pdf

Carl Shows You How:

To keep and exercise your God-Given rights

To understand and implement the laws

To argue and win in court

To handle cops, traffic stops, and judges

 Here is where I started with Carl Miller on you tube.

 Carl Miller - Right to travel without a license pl

What Carl says in court to win on traveling without a license.

 You can learn and repeat this.

It is pretty easy.

 Carl makes this much more simple then any I have studied.

 Know Your Constitution - Carl Miller Part 1 of 3

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1s-zHrNPfkQ

 Treason is the removal by force of Liberty and Freedom from anyone without Due Process of Law.

Any law in violation of the Constitution is null and void of law. Marbury vs. Madison and the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution. The lawmakers with their Patriot Acts are not the end all in this Representative Government, the CONSTITUTION is. Don't get me wrong, the Constitution doesn't grant you your freedoms, God does. It is just a reminder to you of what He gave you. Don't be an indian giver.

Carl defends himself against charge of driving without a license plate. No state may convert a constitutional liberty into a privilege. No law can take away your rights that were given to you by God.

- - -

Laches species of action wherein a party of reasonable intelligence and integrity having a right to take an action as prescribed by law, and fails to timely do so, lose all rights to proceed.

We ONLY have the rights we know and claim.

Speaking in knowledge is how you prevail (I think)