Am Front Line Doctors sue US gov. over covid

Dept. of Human Services

afld-dhhs-documents/injunction-index.pdf

Doc-10-Original-AFLDrs-Complaint-1.pdf

afld-dhhs-documents/Motion-for-Preliminary-Injunction-file-stamped.pdf

Federal Lawsuit Seeks Immediate Halt of COVID Vaccines, Cites Whistleblower Testimony Claiming CDC Is Under-Counting Vaccine Deaths

According to a press release, America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) is asking in a motion filed July 19, 2021 to immediately stop administration of experimental COVID vaccines in anyone 18 and younger. AFLDS is seeking immediate injunctive relief in Alabama Federal District Court to stop the use of Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) COVID vaccines — Pfizer/BioNTech, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson (J&J) — for three groups of Americans.

index:

Case 2:21-cv-00702-CLM Document 15 Filed 07/19/21 Page 1 of 67  FILED

2021 Jul-19 PM 01:01
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
AMERICA'S FRONTLINE DOCTORS, et al., )

Plaintiffs,                                                                     )

                                                                                     )

vs.                                                                                 )         Civil Action No.

                                                                                         2:2 1 -cv-00702-CLM

XAVIER BECERRA, Secretary of the U.S.             )

Department of Health and Human Services, et al.,   )

)

Defendants.                                                                 )

PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

Case 2:21-cv-00702-CLM Document 15 Filed 07/19/21 Page 2 of 67

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................    3

II. SUMMARY OF FACTS.....................................................................................................     3

A. The Unlawful Vaccine Emergency Use Authorizations...............................................     3

(1) 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb-3(b)(1)(C): There is No Emergency..........................................     3

(2) § 360bbb-3(c)(1): There is in Fact no Serious or Life-Threatening Disease

or Condition........................................................................................................... 7

(3) § 360bbb-3(c)(2)(A): The Vaccines Do Not Diagnose, Treat or Prevent SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19    7

(4) § 360bbb-3(c)(2)(B): The Known and Potential Risks of the Vaccines Outweigh their Known and Potential Benefits......................................................................................................             9

(5) § 360bbb-3(c)(3): There Are Adequate, Approved and Available

Alternatives to the Vaccines......................................................................................20

(6) § 360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(i) and (ii): Healthcare Professionals and Vaccine Candidates are Not Adequately Informed.................................................................................................................23

(7) § 360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(iii): Monitoring and Reporting of Adverse Events ................          32

B. The Under-18 Age Category...........................................................................................  35

C. Those Previously Infected with SARS-COV-2..............................................................       38

D. Whistleblower Testimony: 45,000 Deaths Caused by the Vaccines...............................       41

III. LAW AND ANALYSIS....................................................................................................         42

A. Likelihood of Success on the Merits...............................................................................   43

1) Plaintiffs Have Standing...........................................................................................  43

2) Defendants' Actions are Reviewable.........................................................................    44

i. Plaintiffs' Injuries are Within the Zone of Interests.........................................     44

ii. No Statutory Preclusion......................................................................................... 46

iii. The Emergency Declaration and the EUAs are "Final" Agency Action............         54

iv. Not "Committed to Agency Discretion"...............................................................     56

B. Irreparable Injury.............................................................................................................. 58

C. Balance of Equities (Hardships) and the Public Interest............................................     64

IV. CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................     65

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ....................................................................................        67