AFFIDAVIT
State of
) Scilicet
"Indeed,
no more than (affidavits) is necessary to make the prima facie case."
Send
certified mailed # 7010 1670 0001 1311 4850 on the second day of May, the year
of our Lord, two thousand and eleven (2011) to:
First
Judicial District Circuit Court, Ms. Brenda Miller, Clerk or Acting Clerk
Notice to
agent is notice to principal. Notice to
principal is notice to agent.
From
Henry Theodore of the family of Elden ©, (abbreviated HTE)
Respond
to: Daniel of the family of Stribling ©, c/o Post Office Box 1291, Saint
Albans, non-domestic ,
(Note
use of these names Henry or Daniel (or any variation) is protected by
copyrighted. You have thirty (30) days
from receipt of this document to respond and to use the name(s) including the
copyright symbol, only in response to this document mailed to the address here
given.
Re: Judgment Presentment Identification, & Court
Case #
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF
WRIT OF SUGGESTION,
CASE 02C-290
KERRI VICKERS, JOHN
VICKERS, JIM MURRAY and CONNIE MURRAY
VS.
H.
THEODORE ELDEN JR.
Whereas,
in a civil action in which -foreign judgment was rendered in the Circuit Court
of Ohio County, West Virginia, on the 5th day of December 2007 in favor of
Kerri Vickers, John Vickers, Jim Murray and Connie Murray against H. Theodore
Elden Jr. for $366,842.42, with legal interest thereon from the 5th day of
December 2007, until paid accrued to date in the amount of $2,055.62 plus
$392.00 costs for unpaid balance of $369,290.04
Notes from Judgment
from First Judicial District Circuit Court enclosed.
RE: CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE FOR VALUE (CAFV)
PRIVATE
INDEPENDENT ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS - ARTICLE I REDRESS OF GRIEVANCE UNDER NINTH
AMENDMENT RESERVATIONS FOR RESOLUTION AND EQUITABLE SETTLEMENT UNDER NECESSITY,
IN THE NATURE OF REQUEST FOR PROOF OF CLAIM/ DISCOVERY
Dear Ms. Brenda
Miller, Clerk; 2 May
2011
I, Henry Theodore
of the family of Elden ©, the Undersigned, a living soul, a breathing, blood
flowing, sentient man over 18 years of age, being competent to think,
comprehend, attest and or testify and having first hand knowledge of the facts
herein, declares under penalty of perjury of the laws of the united States of
America, that: I want to complete and or fulfill any obligations I face, such
as this referenced court judgment, first duly sworn, deposed and does say and
declare by my signature that the following facts are true to the best of my
knowledge and belief.
THAT Remedy in this
matter exists in exhausting the administrative remedy first by way of
conditional acceptance.
THAT In this matter
of this CAFV, I prepared and submit this document pro se, representing myself.
THAT On receipt of
Proof of Claim as herein explained, and / or resolved of any remedies or
defenses, I will perform and / or discharge the judgment.
THAT Statements
below relate to any aspect of this court case and or judgment, from the
beginning and continuing, and / or to the history of those people and / or
corporations involved as to any; - conflict
of interest, - bias, - coercion, - fraud, - perjury, - non disclosure and or breaches
in law, or rights.
THAT Law is
precise. Every letter, capitalization, punctuation mark, etc., in a legal
document is (may be) utilized for a specific reason and has legal consequences.
THAT I have executed
many contracts and / or sworn affidavits clarifying my own legal position in
life and in law, many of which are filed and / or recorded at courthouse(s),
with the United States federal government, and even with the (then) President
of the United States.
As the actions of
the courts attempt to remove all the physical assets that I have earned and
acquired in 50 years of long labor, I muster my best intellectual efforts to
understand, articulate and exhaust my rights and remedies. As my monetary
resources are all but depleted, I proceeds Sui Juris, in Propria Persona.
For
you and everyone involved with the FJDCC, for period of referenced law suit,
2001 to current, please send me a certified true copy of each oath of
office. Of elected officials, a send
certified true copy from the W. Va. Sec. of State’s office, noting the date
filed and recorded with the W. Va. Sec. of State
I am reading again
the WRIT OF SUGGESTION and note that it says:
“You
may want to file a petition with the circuit court to seek relief.”
Please explain to
me in writing how to do this, and what this means.
Could anyone send
me an example of a similar petition to see possible form and substance ?
Definitions: The seeming name of a person can mean diverse things. When spelled in all
capital letters, it refers to a specific legal entity with unique
characteristics separate from a living human being spelled in similar name but
with upper and lower case letters.
Abbreviations in this
document.
I, me, my, mine means Henry Theodore of the family of
Elden ©, the breathing, blood flowing, soul and spirit, the sentient,
conscious, competent human being, who lives and operates outside of the control
and protection of other legal forces and / or guardians, inclusive of any of my
rights, property, businesses, or corporations.
HTEj means H. THEODORE ELDEN, JR., the legal entity named in the referenced court
cases/ judgment, not the real live human being. This name is synonymous with DEBTOR NAME,
Defendant (and or my persona – the living man acting as authorized agent for
HTEj) and refers to various aspects of the trust / corporation/ account set-up
and named like the living person, but spelled in all capital letters. HTEj is
treated like a legal entity, unique, specific and separate from me, the
Undersigned, previously defined. I may
have connections to these legal entities, referenced as my name spelled in all capital letters, as
authorized agent, benefactor, trustee and / or administrator. Those legal entities may be in any and / or
all these forms; corporations, trusts, Cestui Que Vie Trust, or other, (possibly)
based on the creation of a registered Birth Certificate, and / or separate from
the living breathing man, named Henry Theodore of the family of Elden ©.
EAI means ELDEN ASSOCIATES INC. the
FJDCC means the
First Judicial District Circuit Court of WEST VIRGINIA and clerk(s), judge(s),
jury, elected officials, officers and / or any attorney’s (on this case) and /
or any, related corporation(s) and or legal entities connected and / or
associated with FJDCC or the people and legal entities involved. inclusive of any related staff, officers, corporations, trusts, bonds, etc.
You means Brenda
Miller, Clerk for the FJDCC, acting privately and in her role as clerk or
agent for the FJDCC, and any other people, officers, officials of the FJDCC and
or related organizations, corporations, etc.
PLACE NAMES, in any
spelling or variant capital letters, indicates a proper noun, a political
district, a government, and / or a corporation as well as a geographic region,
such as; WEST VIRGINIA, State of Wet Virginia, Ohio County, Charleston.
US Constitution,
and references to it, here means the Constitution for the United States of America as ratified about 1787 A.D. and
not the Constitution of the UNITED
STATES (corporation) included as articles to that municipal corporation formed
about 21 February, 1871, unless
otherwise stated.
And / or , or
and/or means to apply all possible cases, and answer in full.
End of definitions.
-
- - -
1.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That
you do not have the `duty and obligation' to produce and provide the `proofs of
claim' as requested pursuant to the principals of the `clean hands doctrine'
and `good faith' dealings with me.
2.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That I
have consented, agreed, or signed a contract allowing my `private' property to
be pledged and/or taken in any manner to discharge any debt.
3.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That I
have consented to any `Pledge' of any property for the benefit of person(s),
any private corporation, any foreign principal and / or the federal government,
4.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That I
am not bankrupt or insolvent and have lawful money of account to `pay' debts at
law in respect to Article I, Section X of the U.S. Constitution as it operates
upon the agent of government.
5.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That I
have been given or afforded a DUE PROCESS HEARING in respect to any judgment and
or at the hearing that full disclosure was made as to any commercial scheme (like
a contract of mutual agreement or the transaction of a security instrument) applied
to me or to some corporate entity (straw-man or Ens legis) as named on you
presentments.
6.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That I
can be `punished' for relying upon any decision of the
7.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That I
am a `citizen of the
8.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That I
have been identified as a "U.S. Person" as defined in law.
9.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That my
signature is not the `exemption' which carries the value upon `acceptance for
value' of any presentment/ liability to cause the `exchange,' 'set-off,' or
otherwise to discharge any said tax liability.
10.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That
as to any monetary judgment on me, that you can refuse to accept my discharge
of this judgment that I accept it for value and return it for discharge or via
other appropriate commercial paper in respect to HJR- 192 or by and through my
exemption.
11.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That,
in light of the National Emergency (Senate report 93-549) and the U S.
Bankruptcy (by numerous Executive Orders as codified at 12 U.S.C.A. 95a) that I
cannot discharge any fine, fee, `tax liability' or debt via the remedy provided
by Congress via HJR-192, by and through acceptance for value, for the benefit
of the Republic, as the authorized representative of my Corporate Debtor (Ens
legis) as identified on the IMF file, Tax presentments and or UCC filings with
an `Accepted for value and Returned for Discharge' or other appropriate
commercial paper by or through my exemption.
Articles - - - - Subjects:
government corporations, real money
12.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That
State of
13.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That I
am not one of the people, being above the state corporate government, one of
the sovereign people and therein not named in the statutes of the State of
14.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That
ALL officers and employees of the STATE OF
15.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That
the officers and employees of the STATE OF WEST VIRIGNIA and THE FJDCC are
bound to support Amendment in Article I, § X, (No State shall... make any Thing
but gold and silver coin a Tender in Payment of Debts).
16.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That
the "giving a note does constitute payment." See Echart v
Commissioners C.C.A., 42 Fd2d 158.
17.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That
the use of a (Federal Reserve) `Note' is not only a promise to pay. See Fidelity Savings v Grimes 131 P2d
894.
18.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That
Legal Tender (Federal Reserve) Notes are good and lawful money of the
19.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That
Federal reserve notes are not valueless. See IRS Codes Section 1.1001-1
(4657) C.C.H.
20.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That
(Federal Reserve) `Notes do operate as payment in the absence of an
agreement that they shall constitute payment.' See Blachshear Mfg. Co. v Harrell,
12 S.E. 2d 766.
21.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That
the (judgment) liability came from of what `state', the de jure state ('The
State') or the de-facto state ('This State'), a mere corporation, and that any
reference to
22.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That I,
a Secured Party has access to `lawful constitutional money of account' to `pay
debts at law' without becoming a tort feasor.
Articles of CONSTITUTIONS, Jurisdiction,
Bond, Commercial Paper
23.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That
the United States Constitution operates upon me, a living human.
24.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That I
am a party to the social compact known as the United States Constitution.
25.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That I
am a signatory to the
26.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That I
am a party to any contract or agreement to the Federal Corporate government or
sub-agencies called `States.'
27.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That
the Federal statutes and STATE OF
28.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That I
am a resident of the United States, and a “citizen” of the UNITED STATES
and or it’s corporation(s) formed initially by US Congress on 22 February,
1871, or any derivative thereof.
29.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That I
am a resident of the STATE OF
30.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That the
UNITED STATES and the STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, by becoming a corporator did not
lay down its sovereignty and take on the character of a private citizen and
that it can exercise no power which is not derived from the corporate
charter. (See The Bank of the United
States v Planters Bank of Georgia, 6 L Ed., 9 Wheat 244. Include a certified copy of the corporate
charter of each.
31.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That my
rights did not exist before the creation of the `State.' (see Hale v.
Hinkle, 201
32.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That
there are clauses in the STATE OF
33.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That any
of FJDCC who were required and / or have taken any Oaths, and did so when
required, and properly filed in all places required, contemporary with
completing the Oath(s) as per all laws, stating that they will uphold and
defend the Constitutions of the United States and the State of WEST VIRGINIA, and
or any other oaths or pledges, inclusive of all members, officers, judges of
the said FJDCC, as evidenced by documents from those (custodians) required to
hold copies. Note any oaths, honorary titles, titles of nobility, allegiances,
benefits, gifts, remuneration sources involved with FJDCC’s judges in their life,
to determine any bias. An error in the lawful wording, execution, witness, or
recording of an oath may renders it void.
34.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That the
State of
35.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That
pertaining to this court case, that all those involved in the adjudication have
posted an indemnity bond to indemnify their
actions as to any injury that may befall me. Note surety name and contact, terms, values
and terms of coverage, when and where it is filed and send a certified copy.
36.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That pertaining
to this court case, that the judgment did not become `commercial paper' to be
deposited into any bank, or converted into a depositable item for the
commercial benefit of the Plaintiff in the case.
37.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That
the verdict and / or judgment, as handed
down by the Jury Foreperson and presented or enforced by FJDCC and / or anyone
or corporation for the United States, State of WEST VIRGINIA, stipulated and
identified the `liability' of the statute(s) as they/ it applied or operates on
me.
38.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That
you, or any others operating for the
39.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That no
one involved or associated with the FJDCC (clerk(s), judge(s), jury, attorneys,
etc.) in the State of WEST VIRGINIA or in the United States, acted to subject me
into `involuntary servitude', or involved collusion, conspiracy, or fraud to
injure, threaten or violate my rights, property, livelihood, reputation, and /
or interest.
40.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That
all Motions signed and submitted in the above mentioned case by any appointed
attorney are not void for fraud if I am not the `subject', nor the `object' of
the statute(s) or if liability to the statute(s) has not been proven.
41.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That
the attorney who represented and defended me in his `private capacity' applied
his nexus to COMMON LAW UNALIENABLE RIGHTS AS ASSOCIATED TO THE ORIGINAL
JURISDICTION.
42.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That
during deliberations, the Jury was not given additional instructions by anyone
outside the jury to effect the outcome of the verdict and cause the Jury to
have false thoughts about the magnitude of fault, it’s source, and the value of
the injury, i.e. the awarded judgment.
43.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That I
acted willfully, with full knowledge and intent to cause injury, that I did
cause injury to each plaintiff, and that I was notified, in clear writing, by
each plaintiff, (without distracting, exaggerated or false statements that
might confuse me) as recorded as evidence in court documents to the possible injury
to each plaintiff, that my actions were discrete, separate and independent of my
duty to act for my corporation, that at the time of the action, I was aware
they were causing “supposed” emotional injury to each plaintiff, and or that I had
been so noticed formally in writing directly from each party so “supposedly”
harmed.
44.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That
every statement from FJDCC, at any time, to me, spoken and / or written was
complete, accurate, true and uncontested, so that I would never have any reason
to be confused and or doubt the truth of what I was told.
45.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That I
made voluntary confessions to this supposed crime and or injury caused.
46.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That I
did not request any attorney or anyone to bifurcate this trial.
47.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That I
was not prosecuted with prejudice intent, and to serve as an example in
any way for this herebefore unusual and unique court case, suing for loss of
something that was not the property of the claimant.
48.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That
the charges are not excessive.
49.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That
the judgment was not based on prejudice and bias against me.
50.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That
you did not engage me via your free will choice with intent and full knowledge
of the legal and commercial consequences should you violate my secured
Right(s), Title(s), or interest(s).
51.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That
you engaged me as a personal surety for the corporate fiction; State of WEST
VIRGINIA, jointly and severally, and, that you do have the authority to bind
your employer/principal to any liability, injuries or otherwise as may be
stipulated, agreed to or confessed to by you.
52.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That FJDCC
knew the limits, restrictions, whether statutorily, constitutionally,
territorially, personum, subject matter, politically or otherwise pursuant to
your `Oath of Office,' that you are bound to observe and do as an agent for the
corporate fiction; State of WEST VIRGINIA
53.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That
you knew that, in any manner, to coerce, force, threaten, compel, intimidate,
mislead, deceive, demand or impose or misapply any statute, law or otherwise
constitutes trespass and/or an injury of constitutional impermissible
application of statute.
54.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That
you are obligated to produce any documents, evidence, discovery or otherwise as
requested; i.e., PROOF OF CLAIM(s), Proof of Fact, Proof(s) of Law, Proof of
Contract or whatever that prove your claim(s) as to any jurisdiction, demand
for payment or otherwise to bind me to the corporate fiction; STATE OF WEST
VIRGINIA and / or UNITED STATES.
55.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That,
your acts of enforcement of any statute or force applied against me for private
gain and benefit to the corporate fiction; FJDCC and or the State of WEST
VIRGINIA, where no contract is in place, is not a criminal act on your part.
56.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That
pursuant to; "All that government does and provides legitimately is in
pursuit of its duty to provide protection for private rights, which duty is a
debt owed to its creator, WE THE PEOPLE, (Wynhammer v. People, NY 378) ... and
the private unenfranchised individual; which debt and duty is never
extinguished nor discharged, and is perpetual.
No matter what the government/state provides for us in manner of
convenience and safety, the unenfranchised individual owes nothing to the
government." (Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43) that you and the federal corporation and any of its
franchises (municipalities, counties and states) have all consented to pre-lien
for said debt and duty and any stipulated violations and/or injuries to me.
57.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That
you knew, upon full disclosure by your principal, that `this state' is an
artificial corporate jurisdiction and is defined as "the air and water of
your state above the land and water of the state, `the state' being the
Original Organic Jurisdiction within which I am an inhabitant there upon.
58.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That,
you, and all the legal professionals, are competent, highly trained, highly
paid and certified by your principal corporation, within `this state' in
knowing your capacities and limits within the scope of your office, position
and/or duties therein.
59.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That
you did not enter into a contract with DEBTOR NAME involving the reasons for and
or resolve of this court case and or judgment.
60.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That a
section of your State Corporate Charter, and / or of FJDCC and / or a supervisor or otherwise above you authorized
you to violate the contract, misapply the statute and cause injury upon DEBTORS
NAME.
61.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That
your violation of the Charter, the contract, your refusal to protect me or your
misapplication statute(s) was not your own voluntary private act.
62.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That
date, cause and event as to when did FJDCC’s liability to enforce that contract
to protect the Life,
63.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That
you know and are aware of the Original Organic Jurisdiction described and
empowered under `Constitutional and related documents' and of the federal and
state `fiction of law' jurisdictions which provide the same legal, lawful,
political, commercial and ecclesiastic protections, of which I herein charge
you to act there under in my behalf.
64.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That,
in FJDCC’s engaging or commencing any matter or action against me that,
pursuant to your Oath of Office, or otherwise, that you preserved the Original
Organic Jurisdiction guaranteed to protect my `Liberty, ` `Property,' or other
`secured' rights under the `Republic' State and Federal Constitutions.
65.
PROOF OF CLAIM; that a
contract made by a corporation beyond the scope of its corporate powers is
unlawful and void. McCormick v Market Natl.
Bank, 165 Us 538
66.
PROOF OF CLAIM; that
the FJDCC operates only as a public government function serving first the We
the People, and is not associated with any corporation structures, officers,
employees, and / or incorporated under any other corporate structures such as
the STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA (corporation) and the UNITED STATES (corporation). Provide
copy of original charter, incorporated / corporate papers, any and or all legal
papers on the origin, changes, associations, evolution of the ownership,
purpose, terms, jurisdiction of FJDCC.
Other Articles
67.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That I
cannot exercise my `exclusive' remedy being a Tort Claim for the moral wrongs
committed by you, including but not limited to `constitutional misapplication
of the statute/law, breach of agreement, conspiracy (two or more involved),
Take notice of violation of State and Federal statute/law on `Tender of
Payment,' violation of Nygarrd v. Continental, violation of equal protection of
the law, denying public policy, discrimination of the application of limited
liability for the payment of debt and / or breach of contract (agreement), and
/ or other violations known or unknown.
68.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That
you, possibly having superior knowledge of the law and access to the `proof,'
can provide such proof to the points raised herein to inform me, the Secured
Party, on how I can lawfully resolve the
judgment from the court and or lawfully `pay debt(s) at law' with real money
and not be tricked into becoming a tort feasor. Otherwise, I, a Secured Party/ Creditor must
ask, "What is my remedy?"
69.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That FJDCC and or
70. PROOF OF
CLAIM; That you have not presumed falsely
conditions about me, a Secure Party Creditor, regarding any of the following; my
name, my residency, citizenship, my rights or lack thereof, legal entities,
Debtor’s name, a Cestui Que Vie Trust or any legal entity created on the registration
of a birth certificate, or regarding a name or term, like my name, yet spelled
in all capital letters, and or any supposed legal entity or corporation(s),
particularly the confusion of once government functions, now operating in full
or in part as private, foreign corporations for profit, surrendering their
sovereignty to deal in commerce (US SC).
71. PROOF OF
CLAIM; That each and every part is untrue or concede: as defined in
Black’s Law Dictionary, legal fictions are an 'artificial entity/creature,'
created under the laws of various entities, like the STATE of
72. PROOF OF
CLAIM; That some corporate structures
may be privately held, have Officers, Board of Directors, employees, and / or
may not be bound to support Article I §X, as a 'State created entity,' in that
"No State shall... make any Thing but gold and silver coin a Legal Tender
in payment of Debts."
73. PROOF OF
CLAIM; That corporations may coerce people
in
74. PROOF OF
CLAIM; That the FJDCC named me, the
living human as the accused, the defendant and not HTEj as the accused.
75. PROOF OF
CLAIM; That I am party to the FJDCC
court, that I can be a paid representative for others who would appear before
the court and that I can effect or make rules and stipulations for and in the
court, that the FJDCC is not a private court, exclusive to the realm of B.A.R.
attorneys.
76.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That the
judge's office was created by law.
77. PROOF OF
CLAIM; That I accept, understand, or participate in the united States corporation, its
functions, employees, officers, jurisdiction, etc. with full knowledge and
consent to the meaning thereof, and that no public documents and or filed
affidavits, refute this.
78. PROOF OF
CLAIM; That this is wholly or partially untrue; a legal, binding, contract needs to have:
an offer, consideration and acceptance, being mutually signed in agreement, with
full knowledge and disclosure, by two or more competent, consenting parties.
Living people may freely contract. Fraud, lack of full disclosure, is grounds
to dissolve any contract. Only sentient, mature adults of age may lawfully enter
contracts. Contracts may be made between living people and or corporations.
Only an authorized representative of the corporation may bind the corporation
in a contract.
79. PROOF OF
CLAIM; That a government (or any
organization) can go bankrupt and but not be a corporation, (a sub part and /
or a subject to a larger organization) and that bankruptcy does not yield and
point to creditor(s) who own and / or control the bankrupt organization by
debts owed to the creditor(s) from the organization.
80. PROOF OF
CLAIM; That, in FJDCC, any officer, employee or any one, who is required
to complete and file an sworn, witnesses, recorded oath has done so when
required, as per all pertinent laws, and that any custodians of those documents
did produce a verifiable certified true copy and / or explain why it (may have
or) has been unavailable from numerous notarized and certified inquiries over
recent years, when some records should have been in place for nearly a decade.
This relates to all people involved with the FJDCC and the
81. PROOF OF CLAIM; That this is wholly
or partially untrue; that on February 21, 1871
Congress passed the "Acts of the Forty-First Congress," Section 34,
Session III, chapters 61 and 62. It was titled: "An Act to Provide a
Government for the
82. PROOF OF
CLAIM; That this is wholly or partially untrue; the only immunity any agent has is when they act within their jurisdiction, and they (governments) have no
jurisdiction over real, live, breathing, human beings.
83. PROOF OF
CLAIM; That disproves the FJDCC, in the referenced court case, displayed a flag, here
described. "Pursuant to 4 U.S.C. chapter 1, §§1, 2, & 3; President
Dwight David Eisenhower, by Executive
Order 10834, August 21, 1959; 24 F.R.6865; a military flag is a flag that
resembles the regular flag of the United States, except that it has a yellow fringe border on three sides.
The President of the
84. PROOF OF
CLAIM; That the FJDCC, or any variation or association, is not a private, for profit
corporation. What is their jurisdiction and how did they inform me
of my rights in their court ?
85. PROOF OF
CLAIM; That plaintiff’s witness against me, Yolanda Tam Fredeking, did not commit
perjury in her sworn disposition testimony in stating essentially that I took
professional photos of her wedding, and, after it was over, she had nothing. Dispute up to five separate witnesses who
say that they have seen or have evidence that Tam received at least one hundred
(100), and probably in excess of four hundred (400) photographs, negatives, and
video tapes. Tam only contracted for the creation of one hundred and forty
(140) proofs. (Mike, AG- Consumer, Bailey, Tam;’s Atty, Beaver)
86. PROOF OF
CLAIM; That plaintiff’s witness Jim Murphy did not commit perjury in his sworn
disposition testimony in not including any information about a significant law
suit he filed concerning a car accident, in which case he claimed serious,
costly physical injury, yet the court found nothing in his favor. I retain
photos of Murphy dancing jubilantly at his step son’s wedding – hardly the
behaviors of a severely physically injured man. Show the full details,
discussion and information of this law suit that was included in the FJDCC’s
record and was heard by the jury, showing his propensity to overstate,
exaggerate and possibly to fraudulent present evidence to courts for monetary
reward.
87. PROOF OF
CLAIM; That the defendant was fully informed of the limits and the authority of the FJDCC
in references to him, the living, breathing, human. Who and when was this specifically explained,
to wit, I knowingly consented, signed and agreed to their jurisdiction, their
adjudication, and / or contracted with them, to whit a judgment was rendered..
88. PROOF OF
CLAIM; That the FJDCC, and any related officers, or employees is not connected to any
corporations, such as the State of West Virginia Corporation and or the United
States Corporation or any variations thereof, and that all their officers and /
or employees are current and complete in all aspects of law, particularly with
the executing and timely filing requirements of their oaths.
89. PROOF OF
CLAIM; That Judge Ronald Wilson has no honor, rewards, remuneration, privileges,
titles, oaths other then to the FJDCC, a public government, and not to or of
any private organization, corporation. Prove by listing list all other
affiliations, oaths, allegiances and furnish certified true copies therefore,
and full records to each and every one of his offices, elections and / or
appointments. Disclose records of any;
people, person(s), organization, corporation from whom he was / is connected and
show any evidence he did or may have received any; benefit, honor,
remuneration.
90. PROOF OF
CLAIM; That the
91. PROOF OF
CLAIM; That, as I often requested in word and correspondences, that Richard Beaver
challenged the FJDCC on their jurisdiction over me, that the FJDCC record holds
the specific arguments, to my every possible right and freedom and how they
were debated, articulated, presumed, lost, and / or compelled to be abandoned,
that Beaver made these arguments on my behalf in a timely fashion to be
included in the FJDCC’s review and / or decisions. Once jurisdiction is challenged, and proven lacking, it dismisses the case and all actions taken.
92. PROOF OF
CLAIM; That Mr. Beaver had a signed, written contract, signed by an authorized agent
of his firm and me, stating all aspects
of his defense for me, his objectives, intentions, limits of his service, noting
my support and agreement for him to represent me, and his monetary charges. Present copies of his True Bills in Commerce,
signed by an authorized corporate officer which were presented and paid by me.
Present the written contract from the court record.
93. PROOF OF
CLAIM; That this is not true or concede: I have recorded at the Kanawha County Courthouse, a document I got from the
W. Va. Secretary of State’s UCC Office’s document, that shows no liens have ever been recorded against
me or my company. This seems in direct conflict with the FJDCC’s claim against
me. Explain why the tow records are not ocnsistent.
94. PROOF OF
CLAIM; That this is not true or concede: The thirteenth amendment (Passed by (US) Congress May 1, 1810 -
Ratified December 9, 1812) of the US Constitution, requires that none with a Title
of Nobility, i.e. a B.A.R. attorney, can be a United States Citizen, and there
fore is ineligible to run for public office and or be elected and hold office.
95. PROOF OF CLAIM; That this is not true or concede; A natural person is a human being who is mentally competent and of the
age of majority. This is a human being in the legal world with inalienable
human rights and fundamental freedoms that de jure governments must not only
recognize and protect, but cannot pass a law that will abrogate, abridge or
infringe upon them.
96. PROOF OF
CLAIM; That this is wholly not true;
since about 1938, (
97. PROOF OF
CLAIM; That each and every part is untrue
or concede; a contract is:
- an
agreement between two or more parties, -
with stipulated terms, fully disclosed,
-
signed with full knowledge and agreement by all sentient, authorized parties.
Failing
to fully disclose all information about a contract, it’s stipulations, it’s
conditions and or ramifications, constitutes fraud, of which there is no
statues of limitations. Values over five hundred dollars must be in writing.
Any element lacking, compromised, or in fraud dissolves the validity of the
contract.
98.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That I
violated John and Karri Vickers’s free will, voluntary right to contract for
stated purposes and terms, agreeable to both them and me and mutually signed in
memorial in a written agreement, possibly in the court record, and that they
have any right to exempt themselves for each and all of the provisions therein.
99.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That I
ever previously promised to pay the judgment.
100.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That
it is lawful for the State to demand anything from us other than gold or silver
coin. The legal tender laws only apply to debts founded on a contract.
Judgments and taxes are not founded on contract. Please take judicial notice
that there is no gold or silver coin in circulation. It is impossible to pay.
The law does not require the impossible.
.PROOF OF
CLAIM; That FJDCC is an organic part of
the federal Justice Department? Are they prosecuting me upon your own
recognizance, or did somebody authorize you to?
101.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That
in any one involved with the FJDCC, is not a Mason, and / or has pledged
allegiance, oaths or receive honorarium, remuneration, or benefit from any one
or organization other then the FJDCCC, including either party to this court
case, or their council, etc.
102.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That I
am presumed to know the law, however, it is physically impossible for me to
read the over 60 million statutes plus everything ever published in the Federal
Register. Take judicial notice that I do not know the law.
103.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That
the statute don’t say the clerk shall record ALL orders. I order this case
dismissed.
104.
PROOF OF CLAIM; That I, personally and not my company, was
willingly and knowingly under written and signed contract (whose terms were
fully disclosed) and obligation, that clearly stated that I was to be
responsible to predict and understand the emotional reaction of each of the
plaintiff’s parties to the actions that I undertook. That that contract and or the formal written,
notarized communications I received directly from each party advised me
that I did, would or may be causing them harm and that I acted after I was
so informed, in defiance of their precaution, and that their claim of
injury has been proven by physical facts and evidence, and one or more
independent and separate witnesses (and not just by their own - possibly bias -
testimony). and that they could not have mitigated their “supposed” injury by
simply making a clear statement as to the resolve of my photos & negatives
by taking control of the “supposed” items of harm – the prints and negatives by
either telling me to discard them and or by offering to buy them for a mere $
300.
This request of
`PROOF OF CLAIM' (CAFV) is supported by Affidavit(s) and such Affidavit must be
rebutted `point for point', otherwise, all the facts stand, the record as true,
complete and certain.
When presenting
your proof of Claim, to all points, point by point, complete, truly, accurately,
having all evidence from any who contribute to the response, each party signing
under penalty of perjury, that to the best of their knowledge and believe that
all responses are complete and accurate in reference to the original statements
here listed. Always use full and complete sentences and responses, so that the
original questions do not have to be read, to fully understand the complete
response to the questions.
Due
to the time sensitive nature of this private matter, you are to respond with
complete `PROOF OF CLAIM' within thirty (30) days by certified-priority-return-mail.
As I
have asked before, to the Clerk of FJDCC, please send a current balance owing
on this judgment, to whom it should be paid, complete with full name,
organization and mailing address, form of payment required (if any) and a True
Bill in Commerce, with original wet ink signature by an authorized
representative. Send a certified copy of any contract that requires that this judgment
be paid. May I present payment or
discharge directly to someone ? Who can accept it and when might I find him
predictably at what location, like the courthouse, and during which days and what
hours ? and a phone number, to confirm the possible delivery of the settlement.
CAVEAT
I want to resolve
this matter, but can do so only upon your `official' response by you in
providing the above Proofs of Claim in this matter as to the prosecution being
lawful, proper and `constitutional.'
Please be advised
that it is my good faith intent to rectify this and all future matters,
presentments or otherwise, commercially, and discharge (pay) the Judgment as
soon as possible in behalf of the Debtor/Ens legis.
I
understands my Right to exhaust his administrative remedy/ process in this
commercial matter.
Your presentment has left me somewhat
confused, as I conditionally accept for value your Judgment, I agrees to
perform to it, i.e., pay or discharge it, I can only do so only upon the condition
that you provide 'Proof(s) of Claim as to the Judgment, monetary conditions
within this State, form of payment and other points raised under necessity.
I remains confused
by the indictment brought against the Juristic person HENRY THEODORE ELDEN, JR.
© that was applied to me, a living, breathing, flesh-and-blood, sentient,
natural person, Secured Party, Henry Theodore of the family of Elden ©.
This redraft, or
Conditional Acceptance of the maker's or issuer's original presentment, as
enumerated herein (non-adversarial), is intended to cure any/all jurisdictional
or other defects in process, service of process, venue, and/or subject matter
jurisdiction and is redrafted in good faith and not to cause delay(s).
You are required to
send the 'Proof(s) of Claim to me, (via the address given above) and, if
applicable, in Notary Protest, to another designated person or notary.
Should you fail or
refuse to provide complete PROOF(s) OF
CLAIM within the time specified in this private matter, you certify your dishonor in the matter and consent and
establish:
- a Notarial
Protest may be exercised (performed) pursuant to your default and dishonor.
- You stipulate, agree and confess:
- to the points or facts raised herein, as they
operate in my favor, the Secured Party, and presumption will be taken by and
through your silence and tacit agreement that the "Judgment" is only laid upon a
`corporate fiction/entity known as the Debtor/Straw-man; an Ens legis, and such
`entity' is identified with a name similar mine, but appears in capital letters.
- You failed to
state a claim upon which relief can be granted,
-
You bind yourself(s) for damages via fraud and misapplication of statute and
otherwise stated above via law suit or Tort Claim under necessity in violation,
if any, and/or upon Oath of Office,.
- you damaged and
injured this private man and have stipulated to all the facts that operate in my
favor; that this private man herein is not subject to the Judgment, that you lacked jurisdiction and authority to cite me,
that you misapplied the statute, or otherwise to commit fraud and cause injury
to me.
- that I, a Secured Party, can exercise the
remedy provided by Congress via HJR-192, that is, to discharge debt(s) `dollar
for dollar' via `acceptance for value and returned for discharge' or other
appropriate commercial paper.
- that I, a Secured
Party, may proceed to exercise exclusive remedy of your default, agreement,
misapplication of statute, etc. via Tort
Claim and or can only accept for honor (and Value) the Judgment.
- this `Conditional Acceptance' becomes the
security agreement under commercial law.
-
that I may discharge the debt/liability under necessity via exemption of the
Secured Party Creditor.
- Your insufficient
response will constitute additional grounds upon which to impose a private
personal liability upon and against the original presenter's property and/or
rights in and to property,
- You give permission for a lien to be filed against you for
said default, damages, and dishonor. Said damages are estimated in excess of
$50,000.00. Final amount will be calculated prior to lien and notice to you by
invoice, per your agreement by your silence as stated. Per your failure,
refusal and/or silence.
I
herein have the right to exercise exclusive remedy via Tort Claim for any and
all agreed, stipulated and confessed injuries including but not limited to
violation of Oath of Office (to US Constitution (1787), the Supreme Law of the
Land), violation of Due Process of Law, Misapplication of statute,
constitutional impermissible application of statute and law, fraud, fraud of
scienter and otherwise. You bind yourself(s) for damages via fraud and
misapplication of statute and otherwise stated above.
NOTICE: Constitution Discussion
ARTICLE VI - U.S.
CONSTITUTION; This Constitution, and of the
"As a matter
of due process, an offender may not be sentenced on the basis of mistaken facts
or unfounded assumptions." Townsend v. Burke, 334
"Ignorance of
the law does not excuse misconduct in anyone, least of all in a sworn officer
of the law." In re McCowan, 177 c.93, 170 P. 1100. (1917)
"An officer
who acts in violation of the Constitution ceases to represent the
government." Brookfield Const. Co. v. Stewart, 284 F. Supp. 94.
"All laws
which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." --Marbury v.
MEMORANDUM
OF RECORD; "... an instrument embodying something that the parties desire
to fix in memory by the aid of written evidence, or that is to serve as the
basis of a future formal contract, the designation of the written agreement,
which must exist to bind the parties.
AS TO SIGNATURES;
See accommodation - UCC-3-419.
AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH,
continuing
Be it known to all courts, governments, and other parties,
that I, Henry Theodore of the family of Elden ©, am a natural, freeborn
Sovereign, without subjects. I am neither subject to any entity anywhere, nor
is any entity subject to me. I neither dominate anyone, nor am I dominated.
My authority for this statement is the same as it is for all
free Sovereigns everywhere: the age-old, timeless, and universal respect for
the intrinsic rights, property, freedoms, and responsibilities of the Sovereign
Individual.
I am not a "person" when such term is defined in
statutes of the
I voluntarily choose to comply with the man-made laws, which
serve to bring harmony to society, but no such laws, nor their enforcers, have
any authority over me. I am not in any jurisdiction, for I am not of subject
status.
Consistent with the eternal tradition of natural common law,
unless I have harmed or violated someone or their property, I have committed no
crime; and am therefore not subject to any penalty.
I act in accordance with the following U.S. Supreme Court
case:
"The individual may stand upon his constitutional rights
as a citizen. He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way.
His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no such duty [to submit his books
and papers for an examination] to the State, since he receives nothing
therefrom, beyond the protection of his life and property. His rights are such
as existed by the law of the land [Common Law] long antecedent to the
organization of the State, and can only be taken from him by due process of
law, and in accordance with the Constitution. Among his rights are a refusal to
incriminate himself, and the immunity of himself and his property from arrest
or seizure except under a warrant of the law. He owes nothing to the public so
long as he does not trespass upon their rights." Hale v. Henkel,
201
Thus, be it known to all that I reserve my natural common law
right not to be compelled to perform
under any contract that I did not enter into knowingly, voluntarily, and
intentionally. And furthermore, I do not accept the liability associated with
the compelled and pretended "benefit" of any hidden or unrevealed
contract or commercial agreement.
As such, the hidden or unrevealed contracts that supposedly
create obligations to perform, for persons of subject status, are inapplicable
to me, and are null and void. If I have participated in any of the supposed
"benefits" associated with these hidden contracts, I have done so
under duress, for lack of any other practical alternative. I may have received
such "benefits" but I have not accepted them in a manner that binds
me to anything.
Any such participation does not constitute
"acceptance" in contract law, because of the absence of full
disclosure of any valid "offer," and voluntary consent without
misrepresentation or coercion, under contract law. Without a valid voluntary
offer and acceptance, knowingly entered into by both parties, there is no
"meeting of the minds," and therefore no valid contract. Any supposed
"contract" is therefore void, ab initio.
From my age of consent to the date affixed below I have never
signed a contract knowingly, willingly, intelligently, and voluntarily whereby
I have waived any of my natural common law rights, and, as such, Take Notice
that I revoke, cancel, and make void ab initio my signature on any and
all contracts, agreements, forms, or any instrument which may be construed in
any way to give any agency or department of any federal or state government
authority, venue, or jurisdiction over me.
This position is in accordance with the U.S. Supreme Court
decision of Brady v. U.S., 379 U.S. 742 at 748 (1970):
"Waivers of Constitutional Rights not only must be
voluntary, they must be knowingly intelligent acts, done with sufficient
awareness of the relevant circumstances and consequences."
Birth Certificate. The fact that a
birth certificate was granted to me by a local hospital or government agency
when I entered this world is irrelevant to my Sovereignty. No status, high or
low, can be assigned to another person through a piece of paper, without the
recipient's full knowledge and consent. Therefore, such a piece of paper
provides date and place information only. It indicates nothing about
jurisdiction, nothing about property ownership, nothing about rights, and
nothing about subject status. The only documents that can have any legal
meaning, as it concerns my status in society, are those that I have signed as
an adult, with full knowledge and consent, free from misrepresentation or
coercion of any kind.
Discussion of Human Rights, as I understand them.
Constitutional Amendments provides: "Neither slavery nor
involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall
have been duly convicted, shall exist within the
Declaration of Citizenship. Any document I may
have ever signed, in which I answered "yes" to the question,
"Are you a U.S. citizen?" - cannot be used to compromise my status as
a Sovereign, nor obligate me to perform in any manner. This is because without
full written disclosure of the definition and consequences of such supposed
"citizenship," provided in a document bearing my signature given
freely without misrepresentation or coercion, there can be no legally binding
contract.
I am not a "
"Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a
punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall
exist within the
Declaration of Citizenship. Any document I may
have ever signed, in which I answered "yes" to the question,
"Are you a U.S. citizen?" - cannot be used to compromise my status as
a Sovereign, nor obligate me to perform in any manner. This is because without
full written disclosure of the definition and consequences of such supposed
"citizenship," provided in a document bearing my signature given
freely without misrepresentation or coercion, there can be no legally binding
contract.
I am not a "
According to the Ninth Amendment to the
"The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights
shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the
people."
and the Tenth Amendment to the
"The powers not delegated to the
Thus, my understanding from these Amendments is that the
powers of all
I further understand that any laws, statutes, ordinances,
regulations, rules, and procedures contrary to the U.S. Constitution, as
written by its framers, are null and void, as expressed in the Sixteenth
American Jurisprudence Second Edition, Section 177:
"The general misconception is that any statute passed by
legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The
U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be
valid, must be in agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a
law violating it to be valid; one must prevail. This is succinctly stated as
follows:
'The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though
having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and
ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of
its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. An
unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had
never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to
settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.'
'Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general
principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no right, creates no
office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and
justifies no acts performed under it...
I have articulated, authored, created, signed, notarized and recorded
other documents at the Kanawha County Courthouse, and the W. Va. Secretary of
State’s Uniform Commercial Code office, further clarifying legal positions about myself, my rights, my copyrights, my property
and my knowledge. Be cautioned to know
them well before infringing on my rights. The Common Law copyright of my name(s)
and fines for trespass and / or unauthorized use of it is clearly defined.
Charleston newspaper carried multiple listing of my legal ads which publically
stated information and public record references about my statement(s) recorded
in the Kanawha County Courthouse Miscellaneous Book 40, starting at page 408,
filed on 7-27-2010 including copyrights (originally filed in 2009), UCC Filing
File # 2010 038 333 056, initiated 26 August 2010. I have articulated my
rights, notarized, recorded, published, and by this writing give you clear
notice.
Please respond by
U.S. Mail to Henry Theodore of the family of Elden © at current temporary
mailing address at beginning of this affidavit.
Thank you in
advance in this matter.
FURTHER AFFIANT SAITH NOT.
Printed,
signed and mailed this third (3rd) day of May 2011 A.D.
Subscribed and sworn, without prejudice, and with all rights
reserved,
By: My Hand and Mark as Subscriber autograph:
Henry Theodore of the family of Elden
©– Affiant,
Principal, by Special Appearance, in Propria Persona,
proceeding Sui Juris.
Secured Party
Creditor, private man, Preserving all rights and liberties,
Authorized Representative
and Attorney-In-Fact in behalf of HENRY THEODORE ELDEN, JR., Ens legis,
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The following
Notary Public in and for WEST VIRGINIA,(state), witnessed the personally appearance
and signature of the above-signator, Henry Theodore of the family of Elden ©,
the flesh and blood, living human being, known to me to be the one whose name
is signed on this instrument by personal knowledge and or proved to me, and he
has acknowledged to me that he has executed the same..
Printed Name:_____________________ Subscribed to and sworn
before me this third (3rd) day of May, 2011 A.D.
Signed:_________________________________________
My
Commission Expires: / /
Common Law Seal:
I am the custodian of this document.
I,
™ Ollie Clifford ©, a
Notary Public in and for
Signed:_________________________________________ My Commission Expires: 25 August, 2015
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I
certify that on this 3rd day of May, 2011, a true and exact copy of the
aforesaid Motion was sent, first class registered
Document
sent via certified mail # 7010 1670 0001 1311 4850 to (principals / agents) to:
First
Judicial District Circuit Court, Ms. Brenda Miller, Clerk or Acting Clerk
Darius Barnes ©, All Rights Reserved
Copies may be filed
in Kanawha County Courthouse, presented and / or mailed to an associate(s), and / or Notary.
Basic information
from the original Judgment notice:
IN THE
WRIT OF
SUGGESTION
CASE 02C-290
KERRI VICKERS, JOHN VICKERS, JIM MURRAY and CONNIE MURRAY
VS.
H. THEODORE ELDEN
JR.
WHEREAS, IN A CIVIL ACTION IN WHICH -FOREIGN
JUDGMENT WAS RENDERED IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF OHIO COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA, ON THE 5th DAY OF DECEMBER
2007 IN FAVOR OF KERRI VICKERS, JOHN VICKERS, JIM MURRAY and CONNIE MURRAY AGAINST H. THEODORE ELDEN JR. FOR $366,842.42, WITH LEGAL INTEREST THEREON FROM THE 5th DAY OF DECEMBER 2007, UNTIL PAID
ACCRUED TO DATE IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,055.62
PLUS $392.00 COSTS FOR UNPAID BALANCE OF $369,290.04 UPON WHICH JUDGMENT A WRIT EXECUTION HAS IN THE HANDS OF THE SHERIFF KANAWHA COUNTY, UNPAID AND UNSATISFIED. THE PLAINTIFF SUGGESTS THAT THERE IS A LIABILITY, BY
REASON OF THE LIEN OF SAID WRIT UPON
CITY NATIONAL BANK,
BORDAS & BORDAS, PLLC
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF AS PER AFFIDAVIT
STATE
OF
TO
THE SHERIFF OF
IN THE NAME OF THE STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, WE COMMAND
YOU TO SUMMON CITY NATIONAL BANK, 10 HALE ST. CHARLESTON WV 25301 IF THEY BE FOUND IN YOUR BAILIWICK, TO SERVE UPON THE CIRCUIT
CLERK OF OHIO COUNTY WHOSE ADDRESS IS 4th
FLOOR CITY COUNTY BUILDING, 1500 CHAPLINE STREET,
WHEELING WV 26003 AND BORDAS
& BORDAS, PLLC, 1358 NATIONAL RD. WHEELING WV 26003 A ANSWER, IN WRITING UNDER OATH, TO THE ABOVE SUGGESTION WITHIN 20 DAYS AFTER SERVICE OF THIS
SUMMONS.
BRENDA
L MILLER,
CIRCUIT CLERK,
APRIL 7, 2009
YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO EXEMPTIONS FROM LEVY UNDER FEDERAL
OR STATE LAW .
SHOULD THIS LEVY CREATE A FINANCIAL
HARDSHIP, SEEK THE ADVICE OF A LAWYER
OR CONTACT THE ABOVE SIGNED CLERK. YOU MAY WANT TO FILE A PETITION WITH
THE CIRCUIT COURT TO SEEK RELIEF.
Not used:
RECORDING REQUESTED BY, ]
AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: ]
]
NAME ]
STREET/BOX ]
CITY ]
STATE (SPACE ABOVE
THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S
USE
ONLY)