- Chapter Nineteen`
Every Man
and Woman is Born With the Instinct for Freedom and Liberty. No Tyranny Can
Stand.
GLOBAL SOVEREIGNTY` MOVEMENT`
by Johnny Liberty`
Dedicated
to the thousands of pioneers` who came before and contributed to the research`
and creation of this handbook`
"It is with solemn resolve and respect that the` People of the
Republic of Texas will vow in their` commitment towards their American kindred`
relations and to all the people of the various states` within the Union of the
united states of America.
To act with whatever aid is possible in salvaging` their lands
and sovereignty. With all prayer, the` People of the Republic of Texas shall,
where` possible, help in fostering world peace and` friendship and respect to
all cultures and religions` as private and sacred to all human beings.”
— Plans & Powers of the Provisional Government` of the
Editor’s
Note:
2`
When in the course of human events,
it becomes necessary` for the Posterity and people of Alaska to ensure
domestic` Tranquility, Justice, Peace, Prosperity, and a Republican` form of
government for the Alaska territory, and to protect` the self-evident truths of
our God-given unalienable rights to` life, liberty, property and the pursuit of
happiness, a decent` respect to this present government requires that the`
Posterity and people of Alaska should declare the causes` which impel us to
make this Petition for Redress of` Grievances.
No government can
exist without the consent of the` governed. When it becomes apparent that
government or` agents of foreign powers are violating the rights of the` people
granted to us by our Creator and secured and` protected by the organic laws of
this nation; and when many` of the people of Alaska have individually
petitioned this` government for redress of grievances, issued freedom of`
information act requests, requested explanations of` government actions and
have been repeatedly ignored and` treated with contempt; and when the abuse of
these rights` continues and even escalates, then it is the right, duty and`
responsibility of the Posterity and people of Alaska to` declare openly our
indubitable rights, liberties and` sovereignty; and to alter, reform, or
abolish the government` in such manner as to restore the proper relationship
of` government to its true masters.
The rights of the
Posterity and people of Alaska have been` abridged or usurped by fraud and
misrepresentation` imposed by various governments and their agencies through`
the use of statutes, ordinances, regulations, zoning and` states of emergency
enforced by their courts to displace the` Bill of Rights and the Common law.
This abuse is an` abrogation and derogation of the Common law secured by` the
Constitution of the “United States Organic Act of 1787”
as lawfully amended
by qualified electors of the foreign` states and by the Northwest Ordinances of
1787.
Whereas, for true
ownership of lands, it is an ancient Maxim` of Law that no title is valid
unless the right of possession be` joined with the right of property: which
right is then` denominated a double right, jus duplicatum, or droit droit.
Droit droit is also
known as allodial title or allodium estate.
Right of property
and right of possession are not taught in` our schools, nor explained by
government agencies, lending` institutions, lawyers, real estate companies or
title insurance` companies.
> DROIT DROIT— synonymous with allodial title or` allodium estate; when the right
of property and the right of` possession are joined, a double right; signifies
a complete` title in land.
The State of
Alaska, Alaska State Legislature, Municipalities,` Boroughs and other political
subdivisions of the State of`
> CESTUI QUE TRUST— beneficiary of a trust; estate or` property to which the legal
title is vested in another.
The contempt of our
forefathers towards the cestui que trust` is clearly shown by the 1843
Bouvier's Law Dictionary,` which defines a cestui que trust as “barbarous.”
The concerted
effort to continue to defraud the people by` substitution of the word
beneficiary for cestui que trust is` clearly demonstrated by the definition of
cestui que trust` found in Black's Law Dictionaries of 1891 and 1910:` “It has
been proposed to substitute for this uncouth term the` English word
'beneficiary,' and the latter, though still far` from universally adopted, has
come to be quite frequently` used. It is equal in precision to the antiquated and
unwieldy` Norman phrase, and far better adapted to the genius of our`
language.”
The current version
of Black's 6th Edition Law Dictionary` continues the deception by not defining
“beneficiary” as a` cestui que trust. We the People unknowingly as the Trustor`
in the Deed of Trust and Rents donate the real property` through the operative
word beneficiary to the lending` institutions.
As the vested
owners of the real property, the lending` institutions are entitled to profits
from their real property by` the land occupier or occupier of land (§3 ch 82
SLA 1960),` which translates into a politically correct term — land use!` This
endless tribute of rent from tenants (the people) to the` lending institutions
manifests itself yearly as property taxes` (i.e., trustee compensation fees),
which we pay because we` do not truly own the real property.
This deception
continues, since we are led to believe when` the debt on the property to the
lending institution has been` satisfied on the Deed of Trust and Rents, that we
own the` real property, which is untrue. The State of
But in reality, the
equitable owner has no rights in the real` property. The true owners are the
legal owners or trustees,` which are the lending institutions. In actuality,
banks,` lending institutions and the government own almost all real` property
in
The Legislature of
the State of Alaska has intentionally` legislated the English feudal tenant
status upon the Posterity` and people of Alaska, as demonstrated by the Session
Laws` of 1960 Chapter 82 under definitions: “for the purposes of` this Act, the
term ‘land occupier’ or ‘occupier of land’ means` any person, firm or
corporation who shall hold title to, or` shall be in possession of, three or
more acres of land in the` State, whether as owner, lessee, renter, tenant, or`
otherwise.” [Emphasis added]` WHEREAS the Legislature of the State of Alaska in
1959 to` assure the control of the tenants (the people), created an` “Office of
the Governor” which is defined in Black’s 4th Law` Dictionary: “But a power and
duty may exist without` immediate grant from government, and may be properly`
called an ‘office,’ as the office of executor, the office of` steward. Here the
individual acts towards legatees or` towards tenants in performance of a duty,
and in exercise of` a power not derived from their consent, but devolved on
him` by an authority which quoad hoc is superior.”
Whereas,
1. The
“Constitution of the State of
2. The “Alaska
Constitution” was created by the` Legislators of the State of
3. The “Alaska
State Constitution,” is the current` constitution, an internally modified
version of the` original Constitution of the State of
This unlawful de
facto Alaska Constitution consists of the` following session laws of 1959:` 1. Chapter
169 on the land itself,complete with a` Preamble.
2. Chapter
143 on administrative procedures for` executive, quasi-judicial and
quasi-legislative agencies` of the State.
3. Chapter
50 on the supreme and superior courts.
4. Chapter
94 on Fish and Game.
The Legislature of
the State of
1. The first
amendment was in 1970: “Proposing` amendments to the judiciary article of the
2. The second
amendment was: “Proposing an` amendment to the Alaska Constitution,
establishing an`
Today, even with
the positive documentation of the
Contrary to these
official denials, the Lieutenant Governor` distributes through the Legislative
Information Office a free` handout dated April 1995, entitled The Constitution
of the` State of
This Alaska Constitution
is printed today in the
Why are these
constitutions hidden from the Posterity and` people of
Whereas, the
Posterity and people of
The legislative
department is strong because the constitution` leaves so much for the future
legislators to accomplish, and` because the constitution puts no serious
restriction on the` power of the legislature.”
Using this
unlimited power, the legislature of the State of`
This legislative
chameleon-like transformation from a` bicameral republican form of government
consisting of a` senate and house of representatives, to a territorial`
government composed of a legislature with two houses is` demonstrated by three
different stages.
The first stage is
the “Constitution of the State of
The second stage is
the Legislative Branch created by the` Legislature of the State of
This dual existence
is further validated at 22 C.F.R. § 133.1;` 43 C.F.R. § 2623.0-8; and 26 C.F.R.
§ 31.3401(a)(5)-1. The`
Still, the State of
Whereas, the true
Common law and equity courts are the` law for the sovereign people to maintain
control of our` government. The State of
We the Posterity
and people of
Whereas, the State
of
1. Who are the
public servants and what are their` responsibilities?
2. Who are the
judges and where are the courts located?
3. What is the
jurisdiction and type of law(s) of each of` these courts?
4. What is the
citizenship status of the judges?
5. What is the
citizenship status of the petit and grand jury` members?
6. Are gold-fringed
flags used in the public offices and` courts? If so, where is the authority to
use such goldfringed` flags? What does the gold-fringe signify when` used on
the flags of the
Whereas, the State
of Alaska government and officials` thereof have concealed the identity of
public officials with` their total responsibilities, courts, and the
jurisdiction of the` courts of the State of Alaska. We, the Posterity and
people of` Alaska, demand to know the following regarding the State of`
Alaska:` 1. Who are the public servants and what are their` responsibilities?
It seems that many of the public` servants carry several titles and job
responsibilities to` more than one governmental agency, entity or` corporation?
2. Who are the
judges and where are their courts located?
3. What is the
jurisdiction and type of law(s) of each of` these courts?
4. What is Black
Letter law?
5. Are these
federal courts, courts of the State of Alaska,` courts of this state, ecclesiastical
courts, courts of` several types combined or courts of unknown entities` and
secret jurisdictions?
6. Why are the
judges of the State of Alaska required to` have dual citizenship? What is each
of these citizenships` of the judges (citizen of the United States and the
state)?
7. Why are
employees of the State of Alaska required to` have only a single citizenship
status (citizen of the` United States)?
8. Why are jury
members required to have only a single` citizenship status (citizen of the United
States)?
9. Why is a citizen
of the United States of America denied` access to a petit or grand jury in the
State of Alaska?
10.Why is a citizen
of the State of Alaska denied access to a` petit or grand jury in the State of
Alaska?
11. What is the citizenship
status required to be a member` of a petit and grand jury?
12.Why do these
courts and government offices display a` gold-fringed flag (State of Alaska and
the United States` of America)? Where is the authorization and` explanation to
display a gold-fringed flag? Why is the` gold fringed flag described only in
Army regulations 840-10, 1979 update?
13. Is the State of
Alaska and/or the United States in` bankruptcy or receivership?
14.What is the Seal
of the State of Alaska? How many seals` does the State of Alaska have? Why does
the Lt.
Governor and other
agencies and officials of the State of` Alaska use at least two different
seals? What do each of` these seals represent in all respects? Whereas, the`
United States Code Title 8 Section 1481 under — MISC2` — has the following
recorded from the Revised Statutes` of 1873-74 and 1878 in what can only be
taken as a treasonous statement in direct conflict with the` Constitution for
the United States of America and the` sovereign People of the United States of
America:` This
emphasis statement is for the Posterity of We the` People of the United States
of America to abandon and` disavow our allegiance to our foreign state of`
birthright (each of the several states are foreign to each` other and are
called foreign states).
By what authority
should we desert our country of birth, and` who would knowingly disavow
allegiance to his/her country` in favor of a de facto corporation and forswear
unalienable` rights for dubious benefits and privileges? Do you support` this
R.S. Sec. 1999?
Whereas, the
enabling act of the Congress of the United` States of America for admittance of
a state into the lawful` Union contains two definite requirements. First, each
lawful` state is to become "one of the United States of America.”
Second, each lawful
state shall be on an equal footing with` the original States. The correct
enabling act of lawful states` into the Union is shown below, versus the
unlawful enabling` act language of Alaska.
Lawful
admission into the Union` WHEREAS,
"That the State of Kansas shall be, and is hereby` declared to be, one of
the United States of America, and` admitted into the Union on an equal footing
with the` original States in all respects whatever." 29 January, 1861, c.
20,s. l, v. 12, p. 126. is the lawful means to become one of the` several
states, but`
Unlawful
admission into the Union` WHEREAS,
"That, subject to the provisions of this Act, and` upon issuance of the
proclamation required by section 8 (c)` of this Act, the State of Alaska is
hereby declared to be a` State of the United States of America, is declared
admitted` into the Union on an equal footing with the other States in` all
respects whatever..." Public Law 85-508, 85th Congress,` H. R. 7999, July
7, 1958, 72 Stat. 339 as Amended,` THEREFORE, We, the Posterity and people of
Alaska, now` know that the State of Alaska is not "one of the United
States` of America, admitted into the Union on an equal footing` with the
original States in all respects whatever.” It is rather` “a State of the United
States of America,” one of the “other` States,” “this state,” and “another
State,” all unknown to the` Constitution of the United States of 1787, and the
Posterity and` people of Alaska.
THEREFORE, the
Constitution of the State of Alaska,` Alaska Statutes, Alaska Administrative
Code and all` instrumentalities in one form or another of the State of` Alaska
have no effect, no jurisdiction and are null and void` on the lawful citizens
of the United States of America (also` known as citizens of the foreign
states).30`
Independence for the Hawai’i(an) People`
Editor’s
Note: Similar escapades occurred during the` illegal overthrow and annexation
of the Kingdom of` Hawai’i as a federal State.
The Akaka
Resolution (P.L. 103-150), otherwise known as` the “Apology Bill,” was recently
passed by Congress and` signed by President William Clinton. It has recognized
the` illegal overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawai’i on January 17,` 1893, and
apologizes to the Native Hawai’i(an)s on behalf of` the people of the United
States.4` Internationally renowned Attorney Francis A. Boyle has
interpreted` this action as a window of opportunity for the native` Hawai’i(an)
sovereignty movement to restore their independent` nation state under the
auspices of international law.
It’s necessary to
launch an educational process in the` Kingdom of Hawai’i to teach the people
how to govern` themselves and move toward unification. A provisional`
government for the Kingdom of Hawai’i has been initiated.
All the titles of
the lands have been held in trust for the` Hawai’i(an) people since the
overthrow in 1893.It’s just a` matter of competent and visionary leadership
coming` forward and agreeing on a process and structure for the` unification of
300 or more factions.
There must be
competent, reliable and integral individuals` who can lift themselves into the
role of statesmen/women.
The Hawai’i(ans) do
not need more politicians or selfinterested` leadership whose only concern is
getting reelected` or keeping their piece of the political pie.
Hawai’i has been
ruled by foreigners for generations, partly` because the Hawai’i(an) people
have been unwilling to learn` how to govern themselves, or too busy competing
with each` other through tribal/clan rivalries.
Petty tyrants and
many pretenders to the throne keep the` people divided, thus conquered as
thoroughly as the global` elite can. Better that we all be sovereigns without
subjects.
(See also the
Sovereign Hawai’ian’s Handbook by Johnny` Liberty). 5`
Short History of the Republic of Texas` Editor’s Note: The saga of the valiant effort by
individuals` in the Republic of Texas to restore their independence from` the
United States has not been given its due attention.
History has
been in the making these last three years, yet` few Americans noticed. Until
the front page news` scandalized Ambassador Richard McLaren, accused and`
convicted him of “kidnapping,” and the philosophical` divisions within the
Republic of Texas weakened their` unified resolve, the possibility of a free
and independent` republic in America was so close you could taste it. The`
final word is not in. Blessings to the Republic of Texas. You` were the first
to step out for independence again.
Paralegal, Richard
McLaren, was doing legal research in an` attempt to free the Davis County Land
Commission from the` grasp of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), when`
he discovered the State of Texas had never been properly` brought into the
union of States. In 1845, Texas, which was a` separate and sovereign nation
until that year, was annexed` to the Union.
There is no
constitutional provision or federal law allowing` the United States to annex a
foreign nation. The national` legislature got around that inconvenience by
issuing a joint` resolution. There was not a quorum to vote on the matter,` but
it was done anyway. The foreign nation of Texas was illegally annexed to the
United States without the requisite` number of votes.
On December 13th,
1995, the provisional government for the` Republic of Texas was re-consummated
in ceremonies at the` Alamo in San Antonio, Texas. Texas has always been a`
special case with regards to its participation in the Union of` states. Texas
was an independent nation established and` recognized under the Law of Nations.
There still is an
embassy in Paris, France that was established` by Sam Houston on behalf of the
Republic of Texas.
Upon annexation,
the state of Texas retained its public` domain and still has its own General
Land Office in Austin` for issuing land patents (i.e. land scrip), and allodial
titles.
This provisional
government formally dissolves the U.S. military rule which has existed over its
soil since 1861.
The Davis Mountains
Land Commission, by and through the` acts of its Citizens, have brought about
the reconstitution of` the lawful de jure Government of Texas based on the
Plans` & Powers of the Provisional Gover-nment of Texas of` November 13
1835, the Declaration of Independence of` March 2, 1836, the Constitution of
the Republic of Texas` dated March 17, 1836; the Constitution of the Republic
of` Texas dated December 29, 1845, as amended January 16,` 1850, as amended
August 29, 1994, January 27, 1995 and` June 9, 1995.
Historical
Timeline` Nov 13, 1835 -
Republic of Texas established.
Mar. 2, 1836 -
Texas Declaration of Independence.
Jan. 27, 1845 -
Republic of Texas annexed by United States.
Feb 1, 1861 -
Republic of Texas tries to secede from the` Union. Military rule instituted.
April 12, 1994 - A
legal process was commenced by citizens` of Jeff Davis county in Texas to
perfect regaining the` sovereignty of the Soil of Texas.
June 9, 1995 -
Original Petition of the People of the land` territory of the Davis Mountains
and Big Bend is signed. The` People agree to institute fully operational
government for` the Republic of Texas.
Oct 18, 1995 - The
Davis Mountain Land Commission filed` an action with evidentiary documents with
the Texas` Supreme Court (Case # 95-1002 ) and International Court of` Justice
at the Hague, claiming Texas was unlawfully` annexed in 1845. 10 pounds of documents
compiled over` three years were filed with the action.
Nov 13, 1995 - The
Texas Supreme Court vacated the case` for “want of jurisdiction.” It is the
opinion of the filers of the` action that since nobody contested the claim, it
has been` resolved at law that the Republic of Texas is reinstated as a` free
and independent nation among nations, subject only to` treaties authorized by
its Constitution.
Under the Law of
Nations, the Common law has been` reinstated in the Republic.
Nov 16, 1995 -
Legal process of April 2, 1994, finalized` (Texas Supreme Court case #95-1002).
Dec 13, 1995 -
Legal process of April 2, 1994, finalized (by` the People). Provisional
Transitional Government of Texas` instituted, ending military rule in effect
since 1861. The` Provisional Government of the Republic of Texas, its` agencies
and agents adopt and incorporate the plans and` powers of the Provisional
Government of Texas of Nov 13,` 1835; the Declaration of Independence of March
2, 1836; the` Constitution of the Republic of Texas of March 17, 1836; the`
Constitution of the Republic of Texas dated Dec 29, 1845 as` amended; Jan 16,
1850, Aug 29, 1994, Jan 27, 1995, and` June 9, 1995; and anything in the plans
and powers` consistent with the Common law. The territories delineated` in the
1850 Compromise are affirmed.
Dec 18, 1995 - An
International Abatement At Law of` Previous Appearance by Notice of Intent
Perfect Notice to` the Security Council of the United Nations is filed at the`
International Court of Justice, The Hague, along with the` Declaration of the
Provisional Government and 20 other` documents.
Dec 27, 1995 -
Emergency meeting of General Council of` Government of Republic of Texas adopts
Resolution/` Proclamation of Neutrality under the Law of Nations.
Jan 2, 1996 - Legal
process of April 2, 1994, finalized (in` accordance with Law of Nations) when
final documents` were received into the archives of the International Court.
Jan 5, 1996 -
President of the Republic, John C Van Kirk,` notified State of Texas Governor George
Bush in writing that` the legal process of April 2 was complete. There was no`
attempt made by the de facto administration to discuss the` matter.
Jan 7, 1996 -
Republic of Texas issues Proclamation of the` Transitional Plan which lays out
procedure to be followed` leading up to a constitutional convention no later
than Jan` 7, 1998. The Plan includes an audit of the de facto` government;
changing assets and instruments into currency` of the Republic to be based only
on money of intrinsic value;` elimination, privatization, deregulation or
reorganization of` existing agencies; notification of foreign corporations
that` they are now under jurisdiction of Republic of Texas; order` to all
policing authorities to protect the rights of the Citizens` of the Republic of
Texas; and more.
Jan 9, 1996 -The
Republic’s Secretary of Defense, Archie H. Lowe, sent a correspondence to the
commanders and` executive officers of five Texas militias, calling for
official` unification to establish a Republic militia.
Jan 10 1996 -
Republic of Texas President, John C. Van Kirk,` issues Formal Announcement to
“all people living on the soil` of Texas who cherish liberty, freedom, law and
order,” that` the legal process commenced on April 12, 1994, to regain`
sovereignty of the Soil of Texas had been perfected.
Invitation to
participate in gathering in front of the Capitol` of Texas on Jan 16, 1996.
Jan 16, 1996 - The
United States ex rel State of Texas (de` facto) and its other subdivisions were
served a “Writ of Quo` Warranto,” challenging authority. The document was
served` to George King at Governor Bush's office. The Governor was` given 30
days to refute the Quo Warranto. (Failure to` respond constitutes agreement to
the charges under the` law). The time expired without a reply on Feb 15, 1996.
Feb 2, 1996 - An
affidavit was filed with the Chief Magistrate` of the Republic of Texas (who is
also the president according to an 1836 law) by an expatriated Republic of
Texas citizen.
The affidavit said
two US Marshals had detained the citizen` without warrant and held him at gun
point for questioning.
Feb 8, 1996 -
Warrants were issued for US Marshals Robert` Hartman and David Sligh, US
Attorney William Harris, and` US Judge Edward C. Prado. They were filed with
Sheriff` Jack Bremer, Comal County. In response the FBI circulated` a story
that a militia group threatened to kidnap a judge.
Feb 9, 1996 - KMOL
television news reports that a federal` court in San Antonio was closed down
due to a “rumor’ that` militia groups had threatened to kidnap a federal judge.
Feb 15, 1996 - Time
to respond to Republic of Texas Quo` Warranto (lawful manner to challenge
authority of a` corporate or government entity) expired at midnight Feb 17,`
1996 - Governor George Bush was deposed via “Tacit` Procuration” before a
citizens’ Grand Jury. The Grand Jury` found the Governor had defaulted and
therefore had no` lawful authority over the people of Texas. It was announced`
another Grand Jury would convene on Feb 27, 1996, to hear` charges against
Federal authorities in reference to drug` running, theft and fraud perpetrated
by US Attorneys and` Federal Judges; as well as three murders of people`
investigating these alleged crimes. The abuse of the Capital` Trust Fund by the
Governor's office as a vehicle to rob the` elderly of Texas of lifelong
investments and funneling of` State Lottery monies to foreign accounts not
subject to the` people were also to be investigated.
Feb 22, 1996 -
President Van Kirk meets with head of the US` Marshal’s Service, Jack Dean. Van
Kirk says Dean admitted` he didn't care about law or lawful process. He said he
had` taken two oaths of office and intended to uphold his` corporate oath.
Marshal Dean added, if any Texas Sheriff’s` acted upon the warrants filed by
the Republic of Texas on` Feb 8, 1996, he would have them busted. Dean asked
Van` Kirk if he would remove the warrants but the president said` they would
stand.
Feb 26, 1996 - A
message was broadcast on the Internet that` warned of an assassination order
against John C. Van Kirk,` President of the Republic of Texas, by a federal
office. The` code name of the order was “Captain Kirk” and the status` was
“crash and burn.”
March 13. 1996 -
President Van Kirk suspends Richard` McLaren and others from Council after they
attempted to` impeach the President for his stance that militias were not`
valid in Texas at this time, and that they will come under the` authority of
sheriffs when the Republic of Texas is fully reinstated.
April 4, 1996 -
Federal Judge Lucius Bunton rules that` Richard McLaren, Upper Limpia Basin
Common Law Trust` and the Republic of Texas owe Stewart Title $1.8 million for`
filing liens against the company. In the ruling, Judge Bunton` stated that the
“Republic of Texas” is not a nation, but that it` is an unincorporated
business. President Van Kirk agreed,` saying as the case was presented, the
evidence warranted the` decision. He stated: “Texas, as a nation has to be
first established` at law, then accepted by a majority of the people. This`
requires a political process and a convention.” Van Kirk told` the Associated
Press: “McLaren's agenda seems to 'bounce` off the wall' with frivolous
filings, creating bogus Common` Law Courts, and subverting the truth. I believe
his ‘Republic` of Texas’ will die a quick death.” 7` May 2, 1996 - Republic of
Texas Office of the Treasurer Notice` is hereby given in accordance with the
law of nations, by` the rule of Postliminium in accordance with a Judgment of`
Foreclosure in Cause No. 96-000776-CL, styled We the People` of the Republic of
Texas vs Internal Revenue Service` (IRS), a foreign agency of final
adjudication on April 27,` 1996, in the District Court of Milam, Tarrant county
of this` action eminent domain. That it is hereby ordered in accordance` with
ruling of the court pursuant to jury trail and findings` that all easements or
claims by the IRS to control of` lands, properties, and tenements on the soil
of Texas be immediately` revoked and cancelled and notice of Judicial sale` be
posted. It is further ordered that all proceeds of this sale` be placed in the
Treasury of the Republic of Texas for use` and benefit for the continuation of
the recovery of lands and` properties by acts of postliminy by its People and
Citizens.
Sale time and Location:
North Side of the Capitol Building in` Austin of the Republic of Texas June 18,
1996, at 11:00 a.m.
For information on
the description of the lands and buildings` to be sold and to obtain bid
information please call the` Republic of Texas home office at (210) 349-8994.
This sale` and foreclosure was executed by the Office of the Treasury of` the
Republic of Texas, Darrell Franks, Treasurer.
June 17, 1996 - A
“Declaration of Independence and Reclamation` of the Republic of Texas” (with
cover letter) was` served on the United Nations . This declaration places that`
body on notice of violations of international law and the` United Nations
charter by one of its member states (the` United States), and demands that the
other member states` compel the US to follow the law and international
agreements` that it has made. (This declaration is not an attempt` to join the
United Nations.) A Notice has been sent to all nations` of the world that
according to the “Diplomatic Notice` of Perfection,” the United States is
without authority to represent` the Republic of Texas. A “Diplomatic Notice of
Perfection` of International Discourse” has been served on various`
individuals. A Resolution certifying US District Judge` Lucius D. Bunton III as
representative from the judicial` branch of the United States of America during
the transition` has been passed.
"If there be a principle that ought not to be` questioned
within the United States, it is that` every man has a right to abolish an old`
government and establish a new one.
This principle is not only recorded in every public` archive,
written in every American heart, and` sealed with the blood of a host of
American` martyrs, but is the only lawful tenure by which` the United States
hold their existence as a nation.”
— James Madison, 1751 - 1836` June 30, 1996 –
A Press Release
concerning the recent` lawsuit filed by de facto State of Texas Attorney
General Dan` Morales against the Republic of Texas has been posted to` the
Press Releases section. Notice of an Amended Schedule of Appointment was filed
with the United Nations to certify` the Embassy and the Foreign Ambassador as
previously` declared. A letter has been sent to US federal district judge`
Lucius D. Bunton confirming his position as judicial` ambassador for the United
States during the transitional` period.
July 3, 1996 -
Officials from the Republic of Texas will meet` with FBI agents in Dallas this
morning to discuss the` transition of government from the de facto State to
the` Republic. Also on the agenda are allegations printed in a` local newspaper
that the FBI “regularly informs” the local` police when the Milam District
Court holds court. (Note that` there is nothing wrong with police knowing when
the` meetings are, and in fact they are encouraged to attend, but` that is not
the spirit in which these “regular informings”
were offered.)` July 4, 1996 - Notice has been sent to all nations of
the world` of funds being made available from the Central Dominion` Trust to the
United Nations through the Republic of Texas` treasury. If money talks, this
document screams.
July 8, 1996 -
Copies of three judicial opinions from the` Secretary of Judicial Affairs have
been posted to the Judicial` Affairs area, and a link to that area now appears
under the` Official Documents section.
July 7, 1996- A
Call for Volunteers to serve on the Judicial` Affairs Committee has been issued
by Ray Wanjura,` Secretary of Judicial Affairs. Two of a series of articles
from` the Cleburne Times-Review have been added to the Press` Coverage section.
July 10, 1996 -
Chief Ambassador and Consul General` Richard McLaren was heard on one of the
largest talk radio` shows in Austin on Tuesday after appearing at a press`
conference. The talk show ran for three hours, and response` has been overwhelmingly
positive. Meanwhile, de facto State` of Texas Attorney General Dan Morales
proceeded with a` hearing on a civil suit against the Republic of Texas in a`
State courtroom. Witnesses and attorneys who were present` at the hearing
described it as “a massive railroad job,” noting` that “virtually every rule in
the book” concerning evidence` and procedure were violated by agents of the de
facto State.
One witness was
heard to comment, “There is no justice` system in Texas.” A celebration is
planned in observance of` Captured Nations Week in Fort Davis July 19-21st.
July 11, 1996 - A
Criminal Complaint has been filed with US` Federal Judge Lucius Bunton about
the Texas Department` of Public Safety concerning the interference with the
right of` the People to travel freely.
July 18th, 1996 -
The First Diplomatic Conference was held` today in Pecos, Texas, with Judge
Lucius D. Bunton` representing the United States judicial branch. I was not`
able to attend this conference personally, but according to` Ambassador
McLaren, apparently Judge Bunton has` received instruction from his superiors
at the Fifth Circuit` Court in New Orleans “not to stand in the way of this`
political question.” Judge Bunton has therefore asked that` the question be
removed from his court and taken up with` Congress. The US Congress has already
received and` presented the notice of establishment of Diplomatic` Relations.
(See the Congressional Record for April 30,` 1996.)` October 12, 1996 - The
Republic of Texas has filed an` injunction against the de facto United States
federal` government, and its agent, the de facto State of Texas, in the` United
Nations. With this injunction, the Republic of Texas` has also ordered all
actions pending against Citizens of the` Republic of Texas in de facto courts
be dismissed with` prejudice.
October 23, 1996 -
Today Steven Crear, Vice President of the` Provisional Government of the
Republic of Texas, extended` an invitation to the People of the Washitaw
Nation, as well` as indigenous People of all nations, to attend this weekend's`
Council meeting in Houston. Vice President Crear recently` visited the Washitaw
Nation. “Having discovered that,` through my Washitaw heritage, I, too, am an
indigenous` (meaning ancient or original people of a land) person, I felt`
honored to have the opportunity to meet with Empress` Verdiacee of the Washitaw
Nation. I would like to extend an` open invitation to the People of the
Washitaw Nation as well` as all indigenous Peoples to attend our upcoming
Council` meeting. I welcome them and invite them all in a spirit of` love,
peace and joy, to join us in this movement of cultural` freedom.” Vice
President Crear stated.
October 23, 1996 -
On the day our President Lowe was` kidnapped by College Station police, an
unauthorized` message was faxed to law enforcement in College Station`
threatening violence on the part of the Republic. Secretary of` Defense Ralph
Turner states unequivocally that The` Republic of Texas is a non-aggressive
nation and has no` intention of inciting violence at any time. “"This has
been a` lawful process of filing the documents necessary in every` step of the
process in reclaiming our nation, because we` intend to make this transition a
peaceful one. We've always` stressed that we will use force only in defending
ourselves` from any aggressive, forceful action initiated against us. The` type
of threats made in the unauthorized message are not in` keeping with the
posture of the Defense Forces of the` Republic of Texas,” Dr. Turner stressed.
Editors
Note: There is an ongoing controversy between` Archie Lowe and Richard McLaren
as to which is the` legitimate provisional government for the Republic of`
Texas. These comments were downloaded from Lowe's` website. Since McLaren's
showdown and arrest in Texas` and their website being shut down, I have no
reliable` information from McLaren's side of the story.
October 25, 1996 -
Today, Richard McLaren, Chief` Ambassador of the Provisional Government of the Republic`
of Texas, stated that contempt charges have been filed with` the United Nations
against Dan Morales and Judge Joseph` Hart of the 126th District Court of
Travis county. The` contempt charges cited consist of: conspiracy and
genocide,` in violation of United Nations Charter 2(4); intent to execute`
documents of political extortion; kidnapping of officers of` The Republic of
Texas while attempting to carry out their` rights and duties of political acts
which are protected under` the Law of Nations; attempting to incite and commit
violent` acts to achieve these unlawful ends. The charges are` contained in an
“Amended Petition to Enjoin by Right of` Presumption, which was filed with the
General Assembly of the United Nations,” by and through its Secretary General,`
Boutros Boutros-Ghali, today. Mr. McLaren stated, “These` acts were committed
by agents of Dan Morales on October` 21, 1996, through the filing of a Verified
Motion for Civil and` Criminal Contempt and an Order setting a hearing on the`
motion which was signed by Joseph Hart. These acts are` bogus and unlawful,”
McLaren continued, “because they're` seeking to incarcerate Republic of Texas
officials if they` don't sign over the “Cestui Qui Trust,” which no longer
rests` in the hands of the Provisional Government of The Republic` of Texas,
but in the hands of the People. The rights of the` public trust will be
determined at the July 4, 1997,` constitutional convention. Further, on
November 16, 1995,` in case number 95-1002, the Supreme Court of the State of`
Texas dismissed for want of jurisdiction an action involving` the eminent
domain question of the soil of Texas and its` People.”
March 31, 1997
- PUBLIC NOTICE CONCERNING` PURPORTED
QUO WARRANTO AND MILAM DISTRICT` COURT; To: Richard Lance McLaren and Timothy
Charles` Perkins; Cc: All People and Citizens of the Republic of` Texas; From:
The General Council of the Provisional` Government of the Republic of Texas`
April 27, 1997` !! Urgent
Notice !!` It has come to the
attention of the Provisional Govern-ment` of the Republic of Texas that a
situation has arisen in the` Davis Mountains, near Fort Davis. It is with great
regret and` sadness that the following information is posted:` It appears that
Richard McLaren and those acting with him` have gone completely off the deep
end, disregarding the very` laws he claims to uphold. According to reports by
witnesses` in the Davis Mountain Resort (including Mr. McLaren's` wife), and further
confirmed by our contacts in law` enforcement, both state and federal, there
have been shots` fired between Mr. McLaren’s supporters and law` enforcement
officials.
These actions are
another in a long chain of unlawful acts by` Mr. McLaren, culminating today in
the kidnapping of a` Texas Citizen on nothing but hearsay. This morning, a`
captain in McLaren’s security team left McLaren's property` and proceeded out
of the Davis Mountains resort. On his` way out, it is believed that he stopped
by one of the` neighbors' houses (the purpose of that stop is unknown at` this
time).
After leaving the
neighbor's house, the man proceeded out of` the resort. As he left the resort,
he was stopped by someone` from the Sheriff’s department. The van the man was
driving` was “loaded” according to witnesses (loaded with what is` uncertain),
and he was arrested. It is not clear whether shots` were fired at this point or
not.
As word of this
arrest made it back to McLaren’s property,` apparently the assumption was made
that the neighbor` must have “set up” the van's driver. Based on nothing more`
than this supposition and rumor, two men from McLaren’s` security detail went
to the neighbor’s house and kidnaped` the neighbor. It is not known whether
shots were fired at` this point.
This blatantly
unlawful act by Mr. McLaren illustrates his` contempt for the common law
process he claims to love. The` neighbor was kidnaped by force of arms based on
nothing` more than a rumor — no evidence, no grand jury, no` indictment, no
hearing, no due process of any sort. It is not` known at this time whether the
neighbor is still being` unlawfully held.
Area law
enforcement officials have responded, and are well` within their rights to do
so. Citizens and supporters of the` Republic of Texas are strongly cautioned
and advised to be` wary lest they be pulled into this situation.
After the
impeachment of Mr. McLaren on March 22, he` attempted to perpetrate a coup
d’etat and install himself as` the only member of the General Council. When
this failed,` he attempted to convene a special election by direct-mailing` a
small subset of Texas, and using the fifty or so people who` cast a ballot as
being “proof” that he could not be` impeached, and was the sole charge of the
question of Texas` independence. Mr. McLaren has subsequently decided to`
declare war against the United States, the State of Texas,` and the United
Nations.
The lawful
Provisional Government of the Republic of Texas` remains committed to a
peaceful solution to Texas` independence. We reserve the right to defend
ourselves if` attacked, but we cannot and will not support unlawful` actions
such as kidnapping without lawful process. The man` who was kidnapped is a
Texan and deserves every bit as` much respect as any other Texan. It is this
blatant disregard` for law and due process that has caused the Republic of`
Texas to seek its independence. We will not condone more` unlawful government
under a different name, nor will we` support the actions of a madman, no matter
what his` contributions may have been in the past.
Again, all Citizens
and supporters of the Republic of Texas` are strongly cautioned not to involve
themselves in this` conflict. There is absolutely no justification for placing
life` and limb in jeopardy over the political ambitions of one` man.
April 21,
1997` Apparently, former
Ambassador Richard McLaren` (impeached on March 22), acting in concert with
other` former Council members, held his so-called “election” on` April 19, and
has managed to get his newly elected` “representatives” to pass a declaration
of war against the` United Nations, the United States, and the State of Texas.
The legitimate
provisional government of the Republic of` Texas under President Lowe does not
support these` unlawful acts, nor the declaration of war. The Republic of`
Texas has always sought a peaceful path to recovery of Texas` independence, and
we remain committed to that end. While` we could defend ourselves if necessary,
to date there has` been no verified attack against the Republic of Texas, nor`
even any verifiable cause for the issuance of any Defense` Forces Alert by the
President or Secretary of Defense. While` the same abuses continue that have
plagued all Americans in` recent years, there is no justification for a
declaration of war` by a peaceful people who have not been directly and
overtly` attacked.
This action by Mr.
McLaren, is not only unlawful, but` deceptive, disruptive, divisive, and
fraudulent.
May 3, 1997` The standoff in the Davis Mountains is over. Richard`
McLaren and others with him reached an agreement with de` facto officials, laid
down their weapons, and surrendered.
Two men did not
surrender, and slipped away into the hills.
President Lowe and
other officials of the Republic of Texas` have expressed great relief that no
lives were lost, and hope` that the focus can now return to the issue of Texas`
independence. 8`
“It
is with solemn resolve and respect that the` People of the Republic of Texas
will vow in their` commitment towards their American kindred` relations and to
all the people of the various states` within the Union of the united states of
America, to` act with whatever aid is possible in salvaging their` lands and
sovereignty. With all prayer, the People` of the Republic of Texas shall, where
possible,` help in fostering world peace and friendship and` respect to all
cultures and religions` as private and sacred to all human beings.”
— Plans & Powers of the Provisional Government of the`
Republic of Texas 8`
Provisional Governments` Established in Kingdom of Hawai’i`
On April 15th,
1994, an Interim Provisional Government` Council was formed by proclamation and
decree for the` Kingdom of Hawai’i to repatriate the inherent Hawai’ian`
sovereign. Pursuant to Public Law 103-150 supra, the` Hawai’ian people can reform
their constitutional republic` and resume self-government at will as an
independent` nation state.
In ceremonies at
the Iolani Palace in Honolulu on November` 23rd, 1995, official relationships
have been consummated` between the Provisional Government for the Kingdom of`
Hawai'i and the united states of America. John David Van` Hove was appointed
General Advocate Liaison and` ambassador to the united states of America to
replace John` Nelson who was initially appointed in 1993.
His first duties
include perfecting the paperwork for the` inherent Hawai'ian sovereign to
reclaim their sovereignty` and repatriate into the Kingdom of Hawai’i, and for
the` American sovereign in Hawai’i to get recognition of their` inherent
American sovereignty.
Identity packages
and an educational program are also being` developed. 9`
International Recognition for the American` Sovereign` It is time for American sovereigns to take our cause to
the` world community and shed light on what’s happening in` American today. I
just returned from Hawai’i on a diplomatic` and bridge-building mission by
invitation of the Interim` Provisional Government Council (IPGC), a provisional
government` structure for the Kingdom of Hawai’i.
The constitutional
Kingdom of Hawai’i has just formally recognized` the American sovereign during
ceremonies on Nov.
23, 1995 at the
Iolani Palace in Honolulu. This is a tremendous` leap of faith and
international recognition for the` American struggling to reclaim their
sovereignty in our` homeland.
All the people in
the world have a common struggle against` tyrannical government and the New
World Order. The people` in Hawai’i who are informed about our cause are
sympathetic` to our struggle for sovereignty as they are deeply involved` in
restoring home rule and the inherent sovereignty` of the Hawai’ian people. The
people of New Zealand know` more about American sovereignty than most
Americans.
The people of the
world would come to our aid and support` if they knew what was happening. It is
our duty and responsibility` to inform them.
Many people despise
Americans for what our government` has done on behalf of so-called “democracy.”
They do not` make a distinction between the American sovereign and the` actions
of our United States government.
The people of the world
must make this distinction, and` know that our own government is at war with us
as well. The` people of the world must be educated and informed as to the`
nature of oppression within the united states of America.
Most people will
find common ground with the American` sovereign and learn from us how to cast
off the shackles of` their totalitarian regimes. The beacon of liberty still
shines` brightly in the principles of our constitutional republic.
This is distinct
from our present de facto government and` must be communicated internationally.
Most of the people
of the world do not realize there is a war` going on in the usA. Many Americans
can’t see it either although` they know something is terribly wrong. There is
an` economic blockade around the usA which is hard to see until` you leave the
country. The federal United States has been` bankrupted into submission and
unconditional surrender.
Capital, resources
and jobs are leaving the country at a rapid` rate while capital, information
and news cannot get in. What` is happening in America has already been achieved
in most` of the nations of the world— unconditional surrender under` the New
World Order internationalist structures.
That is why the usA
is at the frontline of the New World Order’s` assault upon our sovereignty. We
the People of the usA` are the last line of resistance against the New World
Order.
This is why we must
succeed in reclaiming our American` sovereignty and reconstructing a
constitutional Republic` from the bottom-up. 10` In
summary, We the People must restore a constitutional republic` in the united
states of America by reclaiming our own` American National\ and/or sovereign
“state” Citizenship — ` then exercising our unalienable rights and defending
those` rights if necessary.
We the People can
restructure and reorganize our individual` and business affairs to optimize the
transitional tools and` freedom technologies available to maximize wealth,
security` and privacy in our lives.
We the People must
abolish the Federal Reserve Banking` system, terminate the Emergency & War
Powers Acts, restore` lawful de jure government, restore private banking and a
constitutional money system, build the infrastructure for` supporting the
re-emergence of sovereignty for all the people` worldwide.
There are over
3,000 sovereign nations on the planet, while` only 250+ members are recognized
by the United Nations.
This is our
mission, if we rise to the challenge and accept it.
It is not
impossible to restore sovereignty as the basis for` both our national and world
governmental systems.
Sovereignty is
awakening once again in the minds, hearts` and souls of the human race. May it
spread like a brushfire` throughout the world!`
Notes and Sources`
GLOBAL SOVEREIGNTY
MOVEMENT`
1. Sourced from
Republic of Texas Resources & Link` Index: www.icresource.com/public_html / CRC/Directory /`
Sovereignty.html See also:`
2. Sourced from
Alaska Resources & Link Index:` https://www.icresource.com/public_html/CRC/Directory/Sovereignty.htm`
l`
3. Sourced from
NANS, Spring ‘97, p.76.
4. Sourced from SJR
19, the Akaka Resolution, U.S. Senator Daniel K. Akaka and the legal opinion
of` Francis A. Boyle, Attorney. See also A King's Battle for` Recognition by
Ken Taylor, Perceptions, Winter 1994,` p.12; Lower the Flag, Lower the Boom by
Michael J. Sommers, Perceptions, Summer 1993, p.5; From A` Native Daughter:
Colonialism and Sovereignty in` Hawai'i by Haunani-Kay Trask. and Ka Lahui
Hawai'i` (the native Hawai'ian sovereignty movement continues` with many
competing interests and agendas).
5. Sourced from
Johnny Liberty, Sovereign Hawai’i(an)s` Handbook (Cascadian Resource Center,
1996).
6. Sourced from
Republic of Texas Resources & Link` Index: www.icresource.com/public_html/`
CRC/Directory/Sovereignty.html`
7. Sourced from Reality
Press, 1996; The American's` Bulletin, January & April 1996; The Free
American,` May, 1996; Reviewed by Estar Holmes.
8. Sourced from
Republic of Texas Resources & Link` Index: www.icresource.com/public_html/`
CRC/Directory/Sovereignty.html` 9.
Sourced from Kingdom of Hawai’i Resources & Link` Index:` https://www.icresource.com/public_html/CRC/Directory/Sovereignty.htm`
l` 10. Ibid.