Writ of Quo Warranto
In the Matter of james-thomas:mcbride
United States District Court Judge Ivan Davis
U.S. District Court Judge Ivan Davis
Albert V. Bryan U.S. Courthouse
401 Courthouse Square
Alexandria, VA 22314
16 June 2014
Via U.S. Postal Service REGISTERED MAIL
RA 393 427 525 US
The purpose of this writ is to review for the Roman Curia the authority claimed by this Court justifying its action taken against the living man james-thomas:mcbride.
Please provide photocopies of the American Bar Association Cards issued to all members of the Court associated with this case and also the Foreign Agent Documents required to be on file. Please include the Bar Association license numbers as a list.
describe for us what is meant by "United States District Court" as
opposed to "U.S. District Court"? Are we to understand that "
Who holds administrative responsibility for the "United States District Court" that you operate? If it is a separate entity, who holds administrative responsibility for the "U.S. District Court"?
show that james-thomas:mcbride was
born an Ohio State Citizen on the land of the geographically defined
Our records similarly show that james-thomas brought claim for his life before the Holy See after unscrupulous men deprived him of his natural estate while still a baby in his cradle. These individuals falsely claimed that they "represented" him, claimed that their commercial corporation was his beneficiary, misappropriated his credit, seized his estate, and enslaved him as chattel belonging to his own estate without his knowledge or consent. Thereafter, they claimed that he was an employee of their corporation, a "volunteer" performing various jobs including work as a postal union employee, a merchant mariner, a withholding agent for the collection of taxes, and other duties as assigned, without payment or other consideration for his work. Does this Court have any information or documentation proving otherwise?
It is our understanding that there are two entities calling themselves "the" united states of America and they are: The United States of America (major) comprised of now-50 geographically defined states created by Commonwealth Trust or Statehood Compacts and joined together by The Articles of Confederation (1781) and the United States of America (minor) a "union" of "American states" comprised of 7 Insular states owned as "federal territories and possessions" including the State of New Columbia/ Guam/ Puerto Rico/American Samoa/ American Virgin Islands and et alia. Does this Court have any information or documentation proving otherwise?
According to our records as part of the fraud perpetuated
against james-thomas:mcbride and his estate - his estate was re-venued twice - once by a corporate franchise of "the United States of America, Incorporated" doing business under conditions of semantic deceit and again by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) doing business as the "UNITED STATES" (INC.) which removed his estate to Puerto Rico and the foreign jurisdiction of the United States of America (minor) described above. Does this Court have any information or documentation proving otherwise?
Is this second
fraudulent re-venue of james-thomas:mcbride's
estate to Puerto Rico the basis of the Court's presumption that he is a
If claiming jurisdiction over the living man james-thomas:mcbride-by what right or reasoning does this Court claim that fraud is a basis for presumption and action against the victim of a crime?
If claiming jurisdiction over a fraudulently created Roman Inferior ESTATE trust that has been moved to a foreign jurisdiction in obvious Breach of Trust-by what rationale does this Court support Breach of Trust or deny the redemption of the JAMES THOMAS MCBRIDE ESTATE by the lawful beneficiary?
Formed as a Roman Inferior Trust the james-thomas:mcbride ESTATE is subject to the Roman Civil Law. As the fraud was discovered and prosecuted under Roman Civil Law and entered upon the Vatican Chancery Court there can be no mistake and no excuse or evasion related to the distribution of assets owed. Does this Court dispute the supreme authority of the Roman Curia over all legal fictions created under Roman Civil Law?
It is our understanding that the FEDERAL RESERVE has since contrived to re-venue these ESTATES rightfully belonging
to American State Citizens yet again, and to claim that they are now being operated as transmitting utilities under UNITED NATIONS auspices. If so, the entire chain of fraud continues to result in more fraud. Fraud once begun taints everything it touches, invalidating claims made at every step forever afterward, no matter how venerable a fraud maybe. That is why there is no statute of limitation on any act of fraud. Does this Court pretend otherwise?
show that james-thomas re-venued his redeemed estate to the jurisdiction of the
air under the direct protection of the Office of the Pope and that he has
maintained his material interests on the land of The United States of America
(major) and the Ohio State as a beneficiary of his birthright estate and that
he has faithfully kept the peace and expressed the goodwill required of him as
an inhabitant of the Divine Province, which has been established as a seat of
government by the Universal Postal Union. Does this Court have any information
or documentation proving otherwise? Does this Court dispute the authority of
the Universal Postal Union or its establishment of a post office serving the
inhabitants of the air jurisdiction represented by the
It is our understanding that james-thomas:mcbride is lawfully a birthright Citizen of the Ohio State having civil authority as Caesar on the land and that he is not now and has never voluntarily consented under conditions of full disclosure and equity to any "US citizenship" or "U.S. citizenship" status conferred by the United States of America (minor) nor any corporate "citizenship" whatsoever conferred by any commercial or non-profit corporation. Does this Court have any information or documentation substantively proving otherwise?
sworn affidavits of unrebutted fact proven in law by due process and standing
on the record of several international courts it has been the practice of
agents of the UNITED STATES (INC.) and of the United States of America (minor) to claim that American State
Citizens (like:mcbride) have by various mistaken acts such as filing tax forms
-when coerced to do so by persons representing "the U.S. government"
accepted [unpaid] employment or otherwise accepted undisclosed private
contracts and thereby obligated themselves to perform according to corporate
policies, regulations, codes, and other statutory rules which apply only to
employees of the United States of America (minor)
/ the UNITED STAPES (INC. ) / the United States of America, Inc. or other
similar deceitfully named incorporated entities operating in international
maritime jurisdictions. Does this Court have any proof of james-thomas:mcbride's
knowing and voluntary employment as
a postal union employee of the
Court have any substantive reason to believe that james-thomas:mcbride knowingly and willingly agreed to give up his
status as a State Citizen in favor of the slave status of a "
over him? That
he knowingly and willingly agreed to be subject to "Selective
Service" requirements? That he willingly and knowingly agreed to
"donate" all his credit - savings, checking, and escrow accounts - to
a Puerto Rican ESTATE trust? That he agreed to give away his labor in support
of a foreign maritime entity merely and deceptively calling itself "the
What was james-thomas:mcbride supposedly
receiving in exchange for "willingly" subjecting himself to the
status of a "U.S. citizen" and giving away all his private property,
even his guaranteed "Natural and Unalienable Rights" to the
deceptively named United States of America (minor)?
Does the Court claim that he received the "benefit" of access to
the "Public Charitable Trust" - an unfunded private trust set up to
provide relief to "freed" slaves in the wake of the Civil War? Does
the Court claim that mcbride received charitable "benefits" from the
"Social Security" program - which was presented to him and millions
of other American State Citizens as a "required government insurance
program" they were obligated to pay for as a condition of having
employment in both public and private sectors? Does the Court know that these
Social Security insurance payments were trustingly placed into a separate
"guaranteed" fund that was subsequently pillaged and robbed by
members of the "US Congress" operating as an oligarchy under
conditions of semantic deceit and fraud as the separate and foreign government
It is our understanding that State Citizen of Ohio james-thomas:mcbride is not subject to his employees and that he is
owed not only good faith service but "amity in perpetuity" "friendship" "aid and assistance" from the British Crown and all members of the American Bar Association who were formerly and wrongly licensed to act as privateers against the estate interests of james-thomas:mcbride. Is this Court aware that as of September 1, 2013 all court officers became 100 % individually liable for their acts and omissions against American State Citizens including james-thomas:mcbride?
likely that the Court endeavors to presume that james-thomas's estate is subject to the Court
and that his estate is the actual object of its actions rather than the living
man. Having been informed that the re-venue of his birth estate by the
"State of Ohio" and its agencies was fraudulent, and therefore the
subsequent re-venue of his birth estate by the International Monetary Fund and
its agents to Puerto Rico was similarly tainted by fraud, and now having been
informed that james-thomas's estate has been re-venued to the jurisdiction of
the air under the protection of FRANCISCUS and that he maintains his material
interests and estate upon the land of Ohio as a beneficiary - what possible
rationale does this Court have for assuming jurisdiction over james-thomas:mcbride
or his estate? He is a living man, a State Citizen of Ohio, a foreign state,
and an American National inhabiting The United States of America (major), a foreign nation, and his
individual estate domicile has been re-venued to the jurisdiction of the air.
He is as immune from prosecution by the
The same acts
of fraud and re-venue perpetuated against j ames-thomas:mcbride and other
American State Citizens were similarly employed against the interests of the
organic American states and The United States of America (major) by criminally
inclined governmental services corporations merely under contract to provide
public services to the victims and by the
James-thomas:mcbride has been charged by this Court
with making false claims of diplomatic immunity. We think rather that it is
this Court and the officials running the
- that is, a
"citizen" of the
James-thomas:mcbride has also been charged by this
Court with issuing false documents to other members of the
We require a prompt reply from the "U.S. District Court" and/or the "United States District Court" - whichever or both of which are prosecuting j ames-thomas:mcbride.
Anna Maria Riezinger, private attorney in service to His Holiness, Francis/ Civil Judge Advocate for The United States of America (major), non-negotiable signature, all rights reserved this day of June in the year 2014.