Stay at Home is Unhealthy

The stress of STAY-AT-HOME is stultifying for everyone.  It’s an un-constitutionalSTAND DOWN” and “LET THE AUTHORITIES MANAGE THIS” routine that rubs us raw.  I thought we were “sovereign” in America[1] .  We’re all stressed to the max with this pressure while expecting daily to hear our call to FREEDOM.

     Instead it’s crickets and more of the same – pushing the “goal” one week or month at a time.  We should have all of these malefactors arrested.

Daily we expect to see proof that the COVIN-19 is really a “pandemic” as opposed to a “PLANdemic”.  Instead, we get the “Chicago - Razzle Dazzle” [] the old “don’t-worry-be-happy” BS from all the main-stream-mockingbird-media.  It's incredibly frustrating.

     This STAY-AT-HOME is bad medicine.  A required vaccine with embedded chip, that will follow this hoax (supposedly just now invented and being tested at OXFORD UNIVERSITY), is absolutely unacceptable.  Especially not one that includes a “CERTIFICATE” that allows/ prevents travel.  Most of us were left with jaw dropping incredulity, asking how is it possible that no one stood up in indignation when Fauci or Gates started talking about this ridiculous usurpation of our RIGHTS under the CONSTITUTION?  Who could believe that we’d need a certificate to travel from Texas to Florida?  Unbelievable concept, impossible to grasp by any normal person over the age of 21 – who’s aware.  This vaccine is unbelievable and Constitutionally unacceptable in the extreme.

     Where is accountability in this crisis?  Who can we point to as being ultimately in charge and responsible for the hardships we’ve endured?  We can look at PRESIDENT TRUMP first and foremost, as most do.  He is after all, ultimately the ONE responsible to protection and uphold the Constitution.  And our state governors, mayors, judges, all carry responsibility for allowing (standing by) enforcement of these Draconian Control Measures.

     This STAY-AT-HOME is an overarching unlawful seizure of our FREEDOM.

     This is a massive test to see how the world can be shut down with a HOAX – controlled and force-fed by media. It’s been a great success. The crisis has created FEAR in massive amounts among the uninformed masses.

     Many of us are living in explosive mode. For example, here PETER OF ENGLAND explodes on behalf of England and the world.  Thank you, Peter! We definitely agree with your aggravation and frustration at the UNFAIRNESS WE HAVE BEEN SUBJECTED TO!


    [1] Every citizen & freeman is endowed with certain rights & privileges to enjoy which no written law or statute is required.  These are the fundamental or natural rights, recognized among all free people.”  U.S. v. Morris, 125 F. 322, 325.  [emphasis added]

It is not the function of our government to keep the Citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the Citizen to keep the government from falling into error.”  American Communications Ass’n v. Douds, 339 U.S. 382, 442.  [emphasis added]

“An unconstitutional law is void, and is as no law.  An offense created by it is not a crime.”  Ex parte Siebold, 100 U.S. 371, 376 (1880), quoted with approval in Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391, 408 (1963).

“The State cannot diminish rights of the people.”  Hertado v. California, 110 U.S. 516.

“. . . at the revolution the Sovereignty devolved on the people; and they are truly the sovereigns of the country. . . the citizens of America are equal as fellow citizens, and as joint tenants in the sovereignty.”  Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 Dall. 440, at pg 471.  [emphasis added]

“People of a state are entitled to all rights, which formerly belong to the King by his prerogative.”  Lansing v. Smith, (1829) 4 Wendell 9, 20 (NY).  [emphasis added]

“The state citizen is immune from any and all government attacks and procedure, absent contract.”  See, Dred Scott v. Sanford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 or as the Supreme Court has stated clearly, “. . . every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature.  He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowmen without his consent.”  CRUDEN v. NEALE, 2 N.C. 338, 2 S.E. 70.  [emphasis added]

“It will be admitted on all hands that with the exception of the powers granted to the states and the federal government, through the Constitutions, the people of the several states are unconditionally sovereign within their respective states.”  Ohio L. Ins. & T. Co. v. Debolt, 16 How. 416, 14 L.Ed. 997.  [emphasis added]-

 - -